Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Staying in the same public sector contract after April 2017
I don't understand the TFL kerfufull - isn't this what HMRC wants the PS to do anyway?
"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...
Probably, yes. But they also are deluded that they expect the flexible workforce to remain in the role or that they can simply dip into the market and get identically-skilled replacements.
I don't understand the TFL kerfufull - isn't this what HMRC wants the PS to do anyway?
It is, it's also the same as happened at the UK Hydrographic Office at the back end of last year and pretty much the entire contractor population walked off site as a result.
Don't know if they have replaced them but the subsequent job ad's were offering very low rates and inside IR35, so I doubt it.
"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.
It is, it's also the same as happened at the UK Hydrographic Office at the back end of last year and pretty much the entire contractor population walked off site as a result.
Don't know if they have replaced them but the subsequent job ad's were offering very low rates and inside IR35, so I doubt it.
Got a UKHO job advert through this morning. Probably see the same few roles a few times a week at the moment:
"The Maximum Daily Pay Rate: £281.43 PAYE Rate ONLY"
But is that low for that role . I'm assuming it is from your tone, but I'm not familiar with those roles.
Low enough that none of the existing contractors wanted to sign up for them.
Security Cleared roles (rightly or wrongly) generally carry a premium as well.
With no travel or accommodation expenses it's even less appealing as the UKHO are based outside Taunton in Somerset, so unless you are very local it's going to cost you to work down there.
"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.
Low enough that none of the existing contractors wanted to sign up for them.
Security Cleared roles (rightly or wrongly) generally carry a premium as well.
With no travel or accommodation expenses it's even less appealing as the UKHO are based outside Taunton in Somerset, so unless you are very local it's going to cost you to work down there.
The important thing is that the Public Sector will need to learn this the hard way. That means vacancies will appear and may or may not be filled.
Then (assuming people don't get desperate and take the new lowly paid roles) the Public sector will identify ways of bringing suitable resources back - even if that is through a consultancy charging significant premiums...
Comment