User Profile

[eek]

Statutory Demands are about formalizing an informal debt - going back to their last attempt it was their attempt to transfer the debt from the IoM to the UK.

Formal demands are a step before going to court but it means I have a question and don’t have time to check post history
...

[eek]

If it’s tracked, it’s scanned as the postman pushes it through the door that would be enough.

Dont seek technicalities like this as it won’t help you - the entire point here is that the money (and supposed loan) came from the IoM and so can’t be chased in a UK court because it’s...

[eek]

Formal demands are the last letter before legal action - worth sending it to Dan Neidle as it will get him to hurry writing his report.

nor sure what the best advice is here beyond asking for proof of the debt and another Subject Access request to get all the information they have.
...

[eek]

As I've explained a lot of times the story of the money is a number of stages

1) Worker does work
2) Agency pays employer for work
3) worker receives money

or
3a) employer puts money in trust as worker has agreed
3b) trust lends worker the money
...

[eek]

I got as far as

On 18 July 2016, Adam Parker of IQ Contractors emailed Amanda, telling her that Umbrella Requirements would contact her before speaking to her agency. He added an intriguing instruction: “Please remember to only mention Umbrella Requirements to your agency.”
...

[eek]

Firstly I want to know who you are as your story doesn’t add up, and your motive is both dubious, years too late and every part of me says that you are GB intending to create trouble

Beyond that it’s a simple mental health issue - I don’t want to deal with you so if you stay here...

[eek]

Given that you were not here in 2010 onwards to provided advice to people - it’s a bit rich to criticize people who were here and recommending the limited options that they knew about to people who turned here for advice.

as such I’m treating you and your criticism with the complete...

[eek]

you know that
loanchargehurt isn’t going to answer the question because that would reveal who he really is and there is something very off about him.

Put it this way he’s mentioned things in here that only those involved in selling schemes would know and nothing they have posted...

[eek]

I assume by odd you mean refused to force workers to use a tax avoidance scheme so the agency could make a few more quid...

[eek]

Where we stand is very simple - providers of tax avoidance schemes named by HMRC should not be on here pretending to be something that they are not.

I've been told exactly who you are and your modus operandi and everything you've posted confirms to me exactly who you are......

[eek]

For the third time: What scheme were you caught up in, and when did you agree to settle?...

[eek]

I am still at a complete loss as to what you are trying to achieve apart from attacking everyone.....

[eek]

But you aren't attacking HMRC you have just posted another rant about WTT.

As I said all you are doing is causing mischief and not helping anyone......

[eek]

And

1) it's the past.
2) I don't think you paid anything into either WTT or LCAG (correct me if I'm wrong but let's be honest here)

Everyone else on here is dealing with today's issues be it West 28th or Boox / Churchill Knight - yet you seem to be obsessed going over...

[eek]

If you don't like what a lobby group focuses on - create your own group......

[eek]

Shall we just say getting people fightlng each other is loanchargehurt 's purpose in life and leave it there.

I believe I know exactly who he is and he isn't here for the good of others - as every post his made should have made very clear by now......

[eek]

It's not common but it's not new.

I remember a firm was selling the idea a few years back because it then allowed the candidate's interview to be used as with applications to other companies. Here's the CV of x candidates and a video in which they've answered some questions..
...

[eek]

Would I be correct in saying that your name is in an HMRC press release?

And I'm confused as to what you have against WTT because they haven't been here for years, heck I don't think we've recommended them for years our advice has been find a specialist but not one who previously sold schemes...

[eek]

Well the restrictions are listed in https://www.gov.uk/government/public...-charge-review

And the reason why I suspect you can’t access it leaps out at me

• promoters of tax avoidance schemes will not be able to access the new settlement opportunity

and when I look at the other restrictions...

[eek]

I didn't reply because the reality is - if you want to be paid and continue to work you need to do so with an umbrella everyone is happy to work with..

As for opting out of Conduct of Agency Regulations 2003 - never do that if you are inside IR35 - it gives agencies and umbrellas multiple...