User Profile

[eek]

The actual issue for the person with two full time jobs would be double use of NI allowances - although I'm not sure how that would play out....

[eek]

Inside IR35 - obvious
Outside IR35 - we don't know if the contractor needs handholding / has a clue and we equally don't know if the PM is a micromanaging moron.

I'm sure the TheFaQQer can explain IPSE's reasoning - as I can understand why REC and end clients would want this situation...

[eek]

As you've agreed a deal - I really can't see your complaint getting very far....

[eek]

Hey that is exactly what IPSE campaigned for - determinations done after the worker has started as only then is the complete situation understandable....

[eek]

Don't remember calling you out on that one before - and can't be arsed to do it now as I've better things to do than hunt google for the common ownership rules / issues....

[eek]

Randell Dorling via IPSE was the go to recommendation here in that scenario

I don't know if it's possible to go direct....

[eek]

If the work is 100% off site, cheaper countries are available....

[eek]

The only inside IR35 that I can think of would be salary sacrifice for an electric car - I don't know of any umbrella firms that offer it though....

[eek]

Shall we just say that neither accountant is that good - there are few things I would trust the opinion of NowPermOutsideUK but it's safe to say he knows this side of tax stuff better than your accountants simply because he is already subject to it....

[eek]

Not really - it's the same pot of money.

The change in status means that the agency needs to deduct all the tax before passing the rest to your company....

[eek]

If the determination change the agency just needs to collect the appropriate tax from future payments or to vise the clause in your contract that allows them to request the money back from your company to ensure the tax is paid....

[eek]

As I point out to my children whenever they complain about such - life's unfair - deal with it...

[eek]

1) Yes -determinations can be changed at any time prior to the end client paying their first invoice for that contract (which could well be 90 days after you send your timesheet in)

2) Pass

3) Its both allowed and a change at the request of IPSE (and others) from how things...

[eek]

The era of measuring lines of code as a proxy for productivity in software development died 20 odd years ago....

[eek]

But the cut will be significant because what exactly can the OP do about it - report the culprit and the OP will be the one sent home and permanently excluded from the IK.

Basically you can’t do it in a sane way - you are better off finding another job and counting down the years until...

[eek]

It depends who the actual end client delivering the product is - if there is decent internal management within the consultancy you may not have a problem, if you are being bodyshopped and a daily rate to the end client that's a problem.

And that is made 100% worse by the fact the end client's...

[eek]

Specifically umbrella companies sponsoring tier 2 with contract - Immigrationboards.com

And yes it is from 7 years ago but nothing has changed there and nothing ever will....

[eek]

They don't exist - and if they claim they do they are lying or dodgy in other ways..

But Tier 2 Visa Sponsorship By Umbrella Company? | DavidsonMorris has more details as to why they can't do so....

[eek]

It won't remember tax law is entirely different to all other parts of the law and as shown by the Arctic case, HMRC don't want the reward of risks taken (i.e. profits from a company) shared by married partners let alone unmarried ones....

[eek]

Emergency tax codes tells payroll to ignore accumulative figures - divide the allowances by 12 and use that 12th as the starting point for all calculations. If you had accumulative figures the income tax and PAYE figures would be better but it's unlikely they would be the great fix you hoped them to...