Originally posted by Eirikur
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
[OFFICIAL] Ukraine Thread
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Well Russia is still on the security council and can't be removed...."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR -
If you bomb a residential area you are going to hit schools and hospitals and churches and so on - are they doing so disproportionately?Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
Just look at what the chances are that so many hospitals, schools etc are being bombed by accident, also taking in account exact the same thing happened in Syria and Chechnya. There is no other conclusion than it's deliberate.
Ukrainians are now contemplating not to provide coordinates of hospitals to the UN, where Russia also has access to them as Russia seems to attack them as soon as they get them.
Of course bombing residential areas is in itself counter to all civilised "rules of war" but to deliberately target a hospital is a special kind of awful.
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
NLAWs are much cheaper ($25k) and work VERY well, UK got at least 20,000 of them and shipped close to 4000 - should have been at least 10000 by now and armour would stop in their tracks.Originally posted by Paddy View PostAgreed, the point and fire rockets like Javelin are very accurate and effective and can be used by anyone. These will will win the war if enough are supplied. They cost $175k each.
Comment
-
There are plenty of examples where owners were sanctioned but companies they owned were allowed to continue generating revenue for the company, but were not allowed to distribute it to the owner.Originally posted by malvolio View PostIF he has been sanctioned, he is not able to generate revenue. Season tickets have already been sold, gate tickets haven't. It's all perfectly logical. Sensible, however, is a different question...
Freezing his assets is good idea, no point undermining that asset by banning ticket sales as it would just reduce the value that it can be sold for later with money going to Ukraine as part of Russian reparations.
No good reason to create backlash from fans who can't get tickets.
I don't expect him to drive trucks, obviously.Originally posted by malvolio View PostI'm sure he'll find time to drive the lorry across Europe.... Or, silly idea, perhaps he can ask the army to do it
It's Boris who decides how many to ship - 10% of what's available, 25% or 50% or even more. These are pretty short range missiles anyway and there are maybe 150-200 of them in the UK, not a huge number but could make a difference in key cities that are getting bombed with dumb 500 kg bombs.Last edited by AtW; 10 March 2022, 11:34.Comment
-
Indeed. The West had collective relief when Russia finally finished off all the hospitals in Syria - over 3-4 weeks of bombing, including bunker busting bombs to get underground hospitals, nobody in the press cared to remember it since.Originally posted by Eirikur View PostJust look at what the chances are that so many hospitals, schools etc are being bombed by accident, also taking in account exact the same thing happened in Syria and Chechnya. There is no other conclusion than it's deliberate.
Comment
-
It's pretty obvious the Ukrainians were deliberately using the hospital as a military HQ of some kind, and patients there were little short of Saddam-style human shields.Originally posted by d000hg View PostIf you bomb a residential area you are going to hit schools and hospitals and churches and so on - are they doing so disproportionately?
Of course bombing residential areas is in itself counter to all civilised "rules of war" but to deliberately target a hospital is a special kind of awful.
Bottom line is that no doubt both sides are playing dirty.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Could you be specific on the ‘pretty obvious’ bit?Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
It's pretty obvious the Ukrainians were deliberately using the hospital as a military HQ of some kind, and patients there were little short of Saddam-style human shields.
Bottom line is that no doubt both sides are playing dirty."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Wow, just wow.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostIt's pretty obvious the Ukrainians were deliberately using the hospital as a military HQ of some kind, and patients there were little short of Saddam-style human shields. Bottom line is that no doubt both sides are playing dirty.
Comment
-
He saw it on Russian news.Originally posted by cojak View Post
Could you be specific on the ‘pretty obvious’ bit?
Just to be clear, if you put soldiers in a room with children it's still a room with children.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Only if you're an idiot ...Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostIt's pretty obvious the Ukrainians were deliberately using the hospital as a military HQ of some kind, and patients there were little short of Saddam-style human shields.
Nice deflection their, trying to label those being invaded when they've done nothing wrong as being the same as a dictator who gased his own people and invaded other countriesOriginally posted by OwlHoot View PostIt's pretty obvious the Ukrainians were deliberately using the hospital as a military HQ of some kind, and patients there were little short of Saddam-style human shields.
No ... Ukraine has been invaded and are trying to defend their people, homes, country. Only Russia, as the aggressor, is dirty here fella. Or would you also claim, if someone broke into your house and started ransack it, and you tried to stop them, that both you and the burglar are in the wrong?Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostBottom line is that no doubt both sides are playing dirty.
FFS, there really are some idiots on this forum.I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter man
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment