• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "State of the Market"

Collapse

  • oliverson
    replied
    Originally posted by fatJock View Post

    Drip feeding info then - so of the time out, 12 months was through choice? That's very different to being benched for 17 months which your initial comment implied.
    No. You looked at 17 months and drew the conclusion it was me or my skill set that was the issue. You didn’t consider any other factors.

    Leave a comment:


  • willendure
    replied
    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post

    fine, but where can we actually find policies? and not just flannel?*


    *from ANY party
    Rerform policy document:

    https://assets.nationbuilder.com/ref...pdf?1718625371

    Not saying it isn't flannel though! Nigels finest flannel.

    Leave a comment:


  • herman_g
    replied
    Originally posted by willendure View Post

    But I dont think this is the main cause of the current slowdown. The offshorers are suffering too. TCS is laying off thousands, so is Accenture from their Indian operations.
    This is true but not what is appears. The Indian companies only target experienced staff for dismissal. When they walk two "highly paid" Indians out the door, they bring in 3 grads, pay them half what the senior ones were receiving, and bodyshop them at a slightly lower rate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cookielove
    replied
    Originally posted by ShandyDrinker View Post

    Starmer might have said it, but what does that actually mean? He's lied about plenty of other things already.

    Given that my local MP is also a member of the cabinet and effectively said to me point blank in a meeting that it doesn't matter what people like me think, we need to level of immigration to make us all better off and to potentially have the babies that the Brits aren't having.

    That, plus both Reeves and Starmer inviting people to come to the UK impacted by the recent US announcements to tighten H-1B hiring, means I don't trust a word they say.

    Until Labour goes, nothing will change.

    100% agree.

    Starmer is a liar and has changed his mind multiple times there is a very long and ever growing list.

    Labour's attitude is as you describe and the they do not care about their own people they want mass cheap labour to feather their own nests and support their own agendas.

    Oh yeah and lest we forget to make it even more of an uneven playing field the added kicker this year of the NI exemption the clowns introduced making it cheaper for businesses to hire Indians and disadvantage British workers even more. All these issues are affecting way more than just Tech.

    The sooner old Nige gets his mass deportations underway the better , we have sold out our future generations with the actions of recent govts. and their policies.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post

    fine, but where can we actually find policies? and not just flannel?*


    *from ANY party
    You aren't going to get a manifesto this far out from an election, and even manifestos are light on detail. There are some policy balloons out there (e.g., ECHR, Stamp Duty) but, as I say, you can safely ignore them. That's just how modern politics works, lots of flannel, even in gov't. Anyway, back to your regularly scheduled pointless market updates...

    Leave a comment:


  • fatJock
    replied
    Originally posted by oliverson View Post

    Not the case, I came hot off a contract writing microservices in node.js and serverless functions, both on AWS. Very in demand skills. I did decide to take a year off and do some travelling between lockdowns. There was virtually nothing on the likes of JobServe back then for a few months at the start. It was laughable. Makes this downturn look like a bonanza. I figured no work out there, IR35 uncertainty still (hadn't been kicked back a year at that point) and having worked solid for years on end. Time to take a break.
    Drip feeding info then - so of the time out, 12 months was through choice? That's very different to being benched for 17 months which your initial comment implied.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

    The chances of current Tory opposition policy making it into law (or even making it to the next election) are pretty remote, even if the Tories win the next election (the chances of which are pretty remote). You can safely ignore their policy agenda.
    fine, but where can we actually find policies? and not just flannel?*


    *from ANY party

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post

    and where would we find those?
    All the UK parties do is attack the competition, without ever laying out any detail on their own so-called 'policies'
    And when they do lay out the detail, your reaction is to say you don't like their leader - or in this case, their last two leaders.

    Starmer is the classic example of the modern politician. Lie to get elected as leader, lie to get elected (their manifesto was every bit as realistic as Corbyn's) and lie to support their usually untenable position on a whole host of issues. And people complain about Boris...

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post

    and where would we find those?
    All the UK parties do is attack the competition, without ever laying out any detail on their own so-called 'policies'
    The chances of current Tory opposition policy making it into law (or even making it to the next election) are pretty remote, even if the Tories win the next election (the chances of which are pretty remote). You can safely ignore their policy agenda.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    So what are the realistic alternatives? Ed Davey falling off a log? Nigel Fantasy Farage?

    People keep picking parties on the basis if the leader's appeal. Perhaps we should look at the actual policies...
    and where would we find those?
    All the UK parties do is attack the competition, without ever laying out any detail on their own so-called 'policies'

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by dx4100 View Post

    We had 14 years of decline and mismanagement under the Tories and Kemi Badenoch is clearly not a solution to anything.
    So what are the realistic alternatives? Ed Davey falling off a log? Nigel Fantasy Farage?

    People keep picking parties on the basis if the leader's appeal. Perhaps we should look at the actual policies...

    Leave a comment:


  • dx4100
    replied
    Originally posted by ShandyDrinker View Post
    Until Labour goes, nothing will change.
    We had 14 years of decline and mismanagement under the Tories and Kemi Badenoch is clearly not a solution to anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • simes
    replied
    Originally posted by SchumiStars View Post
    Starting year3 on the bench. Might find a new hobby.
    Yup, me too.

    As to the alternatives and the attempts. Have applied for permie, contractor as Inside or Outside. Nada.

    Have done some film extra work, temporary work in a warehouse, and I am now a published author. This last probably being my 'new hobby'; to be sure there is no money in it.

    Leave a comment:


  • ShandyDrinker
    replied
    Originally posted by Snooky View Post
    New Visas are not part of the discussions, according to Starmer
    Starmer might have said it, but what does that actually mean? He's lied about plenty of other things already.

    Given that my local MP is also a member of the cabinet and effectively said to me point blank in a meeting that it doesn't matter what people like me think, we need to level of immigration to make us all better off and to potentially have the babies that the Brits aren't having.

    That, plus both Reeves and Starmer inviting people to come to the UK impacted by the recent US announcements to tighten H-1B hiring, means I don't trust a word they say.

    Until Labour goes, nothing will change.

    Leave a comment:


  • Smartie
    replied
    Originally posted by dx4100 View Post
    The place I work at the tech / dev is around 80% provided by Indians - both on shore and off shore.
    My experience in the past 10 years in banking/insurance/trading has been that 80% of the devs and QAs have been Indian (heritage).
    There has also been a fair bit of use of East European consultancies and mostly, they've all been very good.
    My current client has definitely offshored a lot more dev work to a consultancy using Ukrainians across Europe and that is a lot cheaper than UK resource.
    BAs, PMs etc. tend to be less like that.

    Some of it is certainly immigration, but I remember on my IT degree course in London in the 90s, 80% or more were Indian or other non-white UK students. More women than you might expect too, probably because a professional job confers status, which helps in less equal societies.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X