Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
It’s not all doom and gloom out there. Currently have two clients, one wants me to extend for 20% of my time over the next 6 months. The other has agreed to 80% for 6 months then 100% for the remainder of a project - they are suggesting mid 2027. Rate is at a level that my company is happy with and will be reviewed on an annual basis each March.
Just required skills, professionalism and politeness.
It’s not all doom and gloom out there. Currently have two clients, one wants me to extend for 20% of my time over the next 6 months. The other has agreed to 80% for 6 months then 100% for the remainder of a project - they are suggesting mid 2027. Rate is at a level that my company is happy with and will be reviewed on an annual basis each March.
Just required skills, professionalism and politeness.
There might be someone here who has the necessary skills for it. The gig is specialist, reputable agency, seems genuine. I wondered why is this marketed as Inside IR35? I then thought this is more a consultancy than a standard contractor. Surely, the bank can spare an SDS since it needs the skills, but then it will be another consultancy taking the risk not the bank. I also wondered why would consultant go Inside IR35, they would run their own limited company. Then came the budget ... tough times ahead even for medical doctors / consultants earning over £100,000 and that SIPP will go. The Job Ad did eventually make sense, they are hunting for the vulnerable and the needy: sheez.
You have a habit of being new and posting 4 times - so at this stage the most likely scenario is you're related to the Clarity structure in some way, such as being involved with the overall holding company or one of the other umbrellas now linked with Clarity.
Anybody staying with them now is mad. Plenty of UK located umbrellas to trust.
I am new here but I've been in the umbrella sector for 20 years plus. I can categorically guarantee that I have no links to Lucy other than having met her a few times at industry events.
I suspect we will be hearing more about the Cypriot firm - it looks like they own half a dozen pretty well known umbrellas. I'm reserving judgement at the moment but my spider senses are tingling.
I'll keep my identity to myself at least for now. I have a habit of saying things that have been unpopular with competitors and I want to be able to continue doing that.
You have a habit of being new and posting 4 times - so at this stage the most likely scenario is you're related to the Clarity structure in some way, such as being involved with the overall holding company or one of the other umbrellas now linked with Clarity.
Anybody staying with them now is mad. Plenty of UK located umbrellas to trust.
Must admit it's a first for me to hear an agent doesn't know what IR35 is. It's been around for 25 years now.
Agreed, it's far more common to find agents who claim they fully understand it and then make some kind of statement like "you can't get expenses off the client if you are outside", or "You can't be outside if you only work for one client" etc.
What is interesting is that the changes in legislation coming down the line in April may have the unintended consequence of INCREASING the use of umbrella companies, especially by clients who currently directly engage contractors as it will mitigate some of the risk for them should an umbrella fail.
So the mitigation of the risk of an umbrella failing is to set up more umbrellas.
Hmmm, makes sense - in a Reevsian kind of way.
And the detail will be in the Green Book, not ITEPA
Leave a comment: