Originally posted by DaveB
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Public sector contracting
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
I received this from agency
.......
As your recruitment agency, we want to ensure we provide relevant information to you resulting from the UK Government’s plans for new legislation.
You may already be aware, and you may also hear in the 2014 Budget statement, that HMRC are introducing a Bill that is intended to clamp down on false self-employment of onshore workers.
In its current form, the Bill requires recruitment agencies (employment businesses) to verify the tax payments of workers that are placed on contracts with their clients. HMRC have stated that they have no intention to alter the operations of Limited Company (Personal Service Company) workers: however, the wording of the legislation is ambiguous in this respect. As members of the Association of Professional Staffing Companies (APSCo), xxxxx Recruitment is participating in the consultation to seek guidance and clarity from HMRC on the practical implications of the legislation.
On 10th March, HMRC announced that the necessary guidance and clarity would not be available to recruitment companies before the budget statement.
As a result, we want to assure you that when you hear reference to this legislation in the Budget Statement, xxxx Recruitment will continue to consult with APSCo and HMRC, to ensure that current ambiguities within the legislation are resolved.
You do not need to take any action at this point in time, we will provide updated communications as clarity emerges over the coming weeks.
RegardsComment
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostSo Govt, is moving to a new framework for hiring contractors called Contingent Labour One (CL1).
Everyone on the old Capita systems should be getting an email if they haven't already with the new contract. It looks horrible and makes repeated references to "The Temporary Worker".
Anyone else received it yet?
Having had a chat with one of the chaps at a well known tax consultancy their opinion is that the contract is a bit crap. Formal response to follow. Emphasises even more the need to make sure working practices are properly managed.
The story is that someone in Government got their knickers in a twist over contractor-agency contracts not reflecting the back end contracts with govt departments and so insisted they be flowed down without bothering to think it through or re-write them, so now we have end contracts written from the point of view of client-agency being imposed on contractor-agency relationships and references to temporary workers left right and centre.
No chance of getting it reviewed, hence the focus on working conditions.Last edited by DaveB; 17 March 2014, 21:55."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostBad form to quote yourself but...
Having had a chat with one of the chaps at a well known tax consultancy their opinion is that the contract is a bit crap. Formal response to follow. Emphasises even more the need to make sure working practices are properly managed.
The story is that someone in Government got their knickers in a twist over contractor-agency contracts not reflecting the back end contracts with govt departments and so insisted they be flowed down without bothering to think it through or re-write them, so now we have end contracts written from the point of view of client-agency being imposed on contractor-agency relationships and references to temporary workers left right and centre.
No chance of getting it reviewed, hence the focus on working conditions.
Interesting bit was "The Service Provider (this is the Agency) shall ensure that there is an obligation on the Temporary Worker to allow the Customer (Pub Sec Client) to seek assurances that tax and National Insurance has been paid in accordance with all HMRC taxation rules".
It does say though on page 116 that: "The tables below shows the Temporary Worker roles which are in/out of scope for the Contingent Labour Services;
In Scope: Operational and Support Staff
Out of Scope:
· Consultancy.
· Permanent roles including fixed term appointments.
· Admin/Clerical Staff and Junior Managers
· Interim managers.
· Specialist contractors Including “niche” roles, executive/board roles and highly specialist unique roles. e.g. a specialist area of expertise which only a few candidates would be able to fill."
http://ccs.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/site...203%20Hays.pdfClarity is everythingComment
-
Originally posted by SteelyDan View PostJust been looking thru a Cabinet Office document on this...sad I know...but like you have mentioned, it's riddled with AWR and Temp Worker references.
Interesting bit was "The Service Provider (this is the Agency) shall ensure that there is an obligation on the Temporary Worker to allow the Customer (Pub Sec Client) to seek assurances that tax and National Insurance has been paid in accordance with all HMRC taxation rules".
It does say though on page 116 that: "The tables below shows the Temporary Worker roles which are in/out of scope for the Contingent Labour Services;
In Scope: Operational and Support Staff
Out of Scope:
· Consultancy.
· Permanent roles including fixed term appointments.
· Admin/Clerical Staff and Junior Managers
· Interim managers.
· Specialist contractors Including “niche” roles, executive/board roles and highly specialist unique roles. e.g. a specialist area of expertise which only a few candidates would be able to fill."
http://ccs.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/site...203%20Hays.pdf
Edit:
Arse, thats the version specific to Hays, I contract through Capita. Their version is almost the exact opposite.Last edited by DaveB; 21 March 2014, 16:28."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostSuperb Spot! Thanks a lot. I'll take it up with the agency and see what happens. Based on that I should not be on this contract (and nor should most of my colleagues).
Edit:
Arse, thats the version specific to Hays, I contract through Capita. Their version is almost the exact opposite.
Also see page 116 for In/Out of Scope:
http://ccs.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/site...1%20Capita.pdf
However, interestingly:
Table 1: Role Scope
In Scope:
· Interim managers.
· Specialist contractors Including “niche” roles, executive/board roles and highly specialist unique roles. E.g. a specialist area of expertise which only a few candidates would be able to fill.
Out of Scope:
· Consultancy.
· Permanent roles including fixed term appointments.
· Admin/Clerical Staff and Junior Managers.
· Operational and Support Staff.Last edited by SteelyDan; 21 March 2014, 17:04.Clarity is everythingComment
-
And as you were.
It seems that this one got escalated sharpish once the extent of the problem was realised. I wont go into details but "business continuity" became a concern.
Previous (IR35 safe) Capita contract reinstated for 3 months while they sort it all out.
Interestingly the call off contract would have put us inside the AWR as well, meaning we'd be entitled to holiday and sick pay and other benefits. I'm pretty sure that wasn't the original intention!"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Got a call from a pimp (Hays) about a Town Council gig, 6months, usually swerve PS gigs but, having read previous few pages would seem to be okay and I don't have to put myself above the parapet to HMRC so to speak. Mentioned it to the pimp and as usual has no clue on this.
I have downloaded the link from Mal but 214 pages, what am I looking for in that? Also a PCG member and have PCG+ cover.
Thanks
qhHe had a negative bluety on a quackhandle and was quadraspazzed on a lifeglug.
I look forward to your all knowing and likely sarcastic and unhelpful reply.
Comment
-
Originally posted by quackhandle View PostGot a call from a pimp (Hays) about a Town Council gig, 6months, usually swerve PS gigs but, having read previous few pages would seem to be okay and I don't have to put myself above the parapet to HMRC so to speak. Mentioned it to the pimp and as usual has no clue on this.
I have downloaded the link from Mal but 214 pages, what am I looking for in that? Also a PCG member and have PCG+ cover.
Thanks
qhBlog? What blog...?Comment
-
Cheers Mal.
qhHe had a negative bluety on a quackhandle and was quadraspazzed on a lifeglug.
I look forward to your all knowing and likely sarcastic and unhelpful reply.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Today 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Yesterday 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment