The problem with the paper is that the current case law will drive a rather large bus through it. Or end up providing a perfect case where any contractor in the sector will have a watertight case to gain full employee rights that will dwarf the tax collected.
The part to remember is that if you are under the banner of an SI working on a government site you are not a government worker and never have been you are rather ironically in the private sector and being given a sub contracted role in a delivery that the SI owns the risk on.
The government can scream whine or push as much as it wants but if Cap/FJS/HP/ATOS want an outcome then guess who wins? The last thing any of them want is a batch of disguised employment cases just to prove the governments point.
The part to remember is that if you are under the banner of an SI working on a government site you are not a government worker and never have been you are rather ironically in the private sector and being given a sub contracted role in a delivery that the SI owns the risk on.
The government can scream whine or push as much as it wants but if Cap/FJS/HP/ATOS want an outcome then guess who wins? The last thing any of them want is a batch of disguised employment cases just to prove the governments point.

but its not as if we haven't told them. And its not the employment rights they need to worry about, its the bit that follows after someones got employment rights that is the real
Comment