The problem with the paper is that the current case law will drive a rather large bus through it. Or end up providing a perfect case where any contractor in the sector will have a watertight case to gain full employee rights that will dwarf the tax collected.
The part to remember is that if you are under the banner of an SI working on a government site you are not a government worker and never have been you are rather ironically in the private sector and being given a sub contracted role in a delivery that the SI owns the risk on.
The government can scream whine or push as much as it wants but if Cap/FJS/HP/ATOS want an outcome then guess who wins? The last thing any of them want is a batch of disguised employment cases just to prove the governments point.
The part to remember is that if you are under the banner of an SI working on a government site you are not a government worker and never have been you are rather ironically in the private sector and being given a sub contracted role in a delivery that the SI owns the risk on.
The government can scream whine or push as much as it wants but if Cap/FJS/HP/ATOS want an outcome then guess who wins? The last thing any of them want is a batch of disguised employment cases just to prove the governments point.
Comment