The thing is, if eek told the court that the £1000 was actually a gift and the loan agreement was just for appearances sake then a Judge might not be willing to issue a debt order without a witness statement from the original "lender" DealorNoDeal.
And DealorNoDeal would be committing the criminal offence of perjury if he stated under oath it was a genuine loan that needed to be repaid.
------------------
The original scheme providers told too many people that the loans would never need to be repaid. There's no way they would risk perjury just to help Felicitas.
And DealorNoDeal would be committing the criminal offence of perjury if he stated under oath it was a genuine loan that needed to be repaid.
------------------
The original scheme providers told too many people that the loans would never need to be repaid. There's no way they would risk perjury just to help Felicitas.
Comment