• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Water Company Nationalisation"

Collapse

  • Paddy
    replied
    On the turd day of Christmas...

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    From the river to the sea,
    Sewage is all we see,
    Thanks to the Tories,
    Thatcher's legacy.



    On the first day of Christmas, Thames Water sent to me
    tidings of a sewage spill at Witney
    etc

    On the eleventh day of Christmas,
    Thames Water sent to me
    plant life declining,
    fishes gender-bending,
    aquatic insects dying,
    slimy fungus forming,
    seven swimmers vomming,
    river birds abating,
    five pads with wings,
    four floating turds,
    countless pathogens,
    microplastic sludge
    and another sewage spill at Witney

    On the twelfth day of Christmas, Thames Water sent to me...
    - nothing more -
    - the spills went on for just eleven days of Christmas

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    How are the mighty fallen & all that.

    Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

    Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare

    The lone and level rivers of tulipe stretch far away.

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    Expecting Labour to re-nationalise might take a while as from what I have read Starmer isn't too keen.

    That election manifesto from Labour is going to be an interesting read.


    "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss"

    qh
    Last edited by quackhandle; 1 April 2024, 09:55.

    Leave a comment:


  • courtg9000
    replied
    The rail regulator has an OpCo of last resort to bung failing TOC's into.
    Just set one up for the entire country.
    Bung Thames Water into it.
    Oh hold on we had UKFI and now UKGI....
    Precedent already set.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    Didn't we send loads of criminals to Australia?

    They've obviously bred.
    and many to the US of A though the residents frequently forget that.

    New Zealand though we only sent one shipment.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    FFS

    https://inews.co.uk/news/environment...sewage-2981778

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Didn't we send loads of criminals to Australia?

    They've obviously bred.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Who'd have thought that having key parts of the UK infrastructure owned by foreign investors who have no ties to the UK would have any negative consequences. Next we'll hear something ridiculous like the French own our electricity companies and we finance it all via China and the Middle East.

    Leave a comment:


  • tazdevil
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    In the case of TW, the major shareholder was an Australian Investment Bank which sold of the assets, land and reservoirs to themselves for pennies. Some critical assets were leased back to TW at premium rental and leases other were re-sold and the cash paid into offshore accounts.
    Sale and leaseback with the intention of theft rather than using the money to invest in infrastructure should be illegal if it isn't already. Public utilities shouldn't be allowed the sell their infrastructure at all to preserve access to critical assets for the national good. Perhaps a reset is required and these businesses and the assets they utilise should be re-nationalised, without compensation if dodgy accounting has been involved?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Smartie View Post
    It's a common situation where investment companies buy a company then load it with debt, effectively buying the company with its own money.
    In this case it was during Macquarie's ownership but it happens quite a lot.

    All the value is sucked out of a company then the investors sell up and move on, leaving customers with high bills and crap infrastructure.
    Yet another case of privatising profits and nationalising debt.
    This needs to be banned.
    In the case of TW, the major shareholder was an Australian Investment Bank which sold of the assets, land and reservoirs to themselves for pennies. Some critical assets were leased back to TW at premium rental and leases other were re-sold and the cash paid into offshore accounts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Smartie
    replied
    It's a common situation where investment companies buy a company then load it with debt, effectively buying the company with its own money.
    In this case it was during Macquarie's ownership but it happens quite a lot.

    All the value is sucked out of a company then the investors sell up and move on, leaving customers with high bills and crap infrastructure.
    Yet another case of privatising profits and nationalising debt.
    This needs to be banned.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Perhaps if they use their profits to improve the infrastructure before paying out large divis to the shareholders, they would not be in such a mess in the first place. Thatcher's original (if somewhat optimistic!) idea was to privatise to incentivise competition and hence performance, not enrich private shareholders. That idea seems to have got lost somewhere along the way, probably down to the toothless OFWAT quango.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    take into national ownership and fix the spills!

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    started a topic Water Company Nationalisation

    Water Company Nationalisation

    I wanted to label the thread something else due to the state of our rivers.

    Starting with Thames Water after the next GE. (https://www.theguardian.com/environm...bt-interactive)

    https://www.theguardian.com/business...00m-of-funding

    Investors at Thames Water have pulled the plug on £500m of emergency funding, raising concerns about the financial future of the country’s largest water company and increasing the prospect of nationalisation.
    The beleaguered utilities company announced this morning that its shareholders had refused to provide the first tranche of £750m funding set to secure its short-term cashflow, after the company had failed to meet certain conditions.

    The funding failure heightens the possibility that Thames Water could be placed into special administration, which would result in the government stepping in and temporarily renationalising the company.
    Chris Weston, the chief executive of Thames Water, said on Thursday that this was a “long way off” but did not rule out the possibility.

    “If at the end of the day – probably well into the end of next year – we were in a situation where we had no equity, then there would be the prospect … of special administration, but we are a long way from that point at the moment,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
    “There is a possibility but the key message today is one of reassurance.”
    He said that the business had enough cash to last until May 2025 and it would be working to secure a final determination with Ofwat by the end of the year, while trying to secure extra equity from new and existing shareholders. He added that the company would continue to serve its 15 million customers as usual.




Working...
X