Reply to: Jacob Rees-Mogg

[cojak]

I’ve got bored with this.

Thread closed.

If you both continue outside of this thread I will ban you both for a week.

[Whorty]

But at least I can spell check my posts...

But there is a gap between being a tory-leaning voter and a racist bigot. Just like there is one between being a socialist-leaning one and a raving loon.

Posting from a mobile phone, without my glasses on

I'd rather be a raving loon than a bigoted racist

[xoggoth]

The irony is you have (not for the first time) misread my post. The definition I posted makes no mention of you being stupid or of where you formed your views.
You have hard-right views, and have shared them many, many times especially recently in your comments on Sunak, Truss, etc. I'm not even saying that hard-right views are 'wrong' so there's no need to get upset about it. But you are just so blinkered that any other opinion is seen as an attack and you read insults into every disagreement. That does make me think you're a bit of an idiot, unlike your political views.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh! Now I am totally confooooosed! The two most sensible CUkers, IMO, are disagreeing??? OK. Iwill have to look at this again tomorrow once the very rare vodka has worn off.

[_V_]

Sick to death of these public school educated, posh Tory

types

[darmstadt]

[SueEllen]

The irony is you have (not for the first time) misread my post. The definition I posted makes no mention of you being stupid or of where you formed your views.
You have hard-right views, and have shared them many, many times especially recently in your comments on Sunak, Truss, etc. I'm not even saying that hard-right views are 'wrong' so there's no need to get upset about it. But you are just so blinkered that any other opinion is seen as an attack and you read insults into every disagreement. That does make me think you're a bit of an idiot, unlike your political views.

Put me on ignore if you can't cope with someone holding different views.

He sounds like the people I had to tolerate (and still do but not so much) who seemed to think Corbyn being Labour leader was the second coming...

[d000hg]

I'm not arguing any more. If your grasp of written English is so poor that you think I have hard right views, and if your view of me is that I'm too stupid and poorly educated to form an opinion of my own all by myself, then there is absolutely no point.

And go look up "argument" sometime. You might find it informative.

The irony is you have (not for the first time) misread my post. The definition I posted makes no mention of you being stupid or of where you formed your views.
You have hard-right views, and have shared them many, many times especially recently in your comments on Sunak, Truss, etc. I'm not even saying that hard-right views are 'wrong' so there's no need to get upset about it. But you are just so blinkered that any other opinion is seen as an attack and you read insults into every disagreement. That does make me think you're a bit of an idiot, unlike your political views.

Put me on ignore if you can't cope with someone holding different views.

[DoctorStrangelove]

In General? Good luck with that…

Wot? Specifically like?

[malvolio]

But you're not a Tory-leaning voter. You are a Tory puppet who parrots the nonsense from #10 about how every calamitous cock-up is actually a success. Even when they then back-track, you maintain how great both contractionary policies are.

As I posted the other day, bigot doesn't mean what most use it as:
You ARE obstinately attached to your hard-right views so by the definition, you ARE a bigot. But I have no reason to suspect any racist element - that's you two waving your dicks about.

I'm not arguing any more. If your grasp of written English is so poor that you think I have hard right views, and if your view of me is that I'm too stupid and poorly educated to form an opinion of my own all by myself, then there is absolutely no point.

And go look up "argument" sometime. You might find it informative.

[d000hg]

But at least I can spell check my posts...

But there is a gap between being a tory-leaning voter and a racist bigot.

But you're not a Tory-leaning voter. You are a Tory puppet who parrots the nonsense from #10 about how every calamitous cock-up is actually a success. Even when they then back-track, you maintain how great both contractionary policies are.

As I posted the other day, bigot doesn't mean what most use it as:

a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction

You ARE obstinately attached to your hard-right views so by the definition, you ARE a bigot. But I have no reason to suspect any racist element - that's you two waving your dicks about.

[malvolio]

Don't upset him. We don't really know him. His posts on here are not tgectrue him

But at least I can spell check my posts...

But there is a gap between being a tory-leaning voter and a racist bigot. Just like there is one between being a socialist-leaning one and a raving loon.

[Whorty]

How about an unbigoted racist, or a non-racist bigot?

Don't upset him. We don't really know him. His posts on here are not tgectrue him

[d000hg]

Not at all. But refusing to be labelled a bigoted racist, which was what I took from the earlier post, when I am nothing of the sort, is not being thin-skinned.

How about an unbigoted racist, or a non-racist bigot?

[NotAllThere]

[cojak]

In General? Good luck with that…