• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Let them eat c*** part 193"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Paralytic View Post

    Mr Lee should have identified as the cake, then he'd likely have a case.
    Especially if it was a fruit cake.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paralytic
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post

    That is a good point. It was the message on the cake, not the person requesting the cake, that was being refused.

    If Mr Lee had asked for "Happy Birthday Brian" and the bakery refused because they didn't want to serve a gay person then there'd be a case.
    Mr Lee should have identified as the cake, then he'd likely have a case.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    nope its hilarious!
    Nope, it's crap.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

    Dats Racist
    nope its hilarious!

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    yep me too

    Click image for larger version

Name:	220px-Norbit_%282007_film%29_poster.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	21.8 KB
ID:	4198782
    Dats Racist

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post

    I've no idea why I have this impression, but if I were choosing you a bum-cake I'd pick brown icing.
    yep me too

    Click image for larger version

Name:	220px-Norbit_%282007_film%29_poster.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	21.8 KB
ID:	4198782

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Hmm. Maybe I will order a cake with a big lady bum in pink icing for my next birthday,
    I've no idea why I have this impression, but if I were choosing you a bum-cake I'd pick brown icing.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Hmm. Maybe I will order a cake with a big lady bum in pink icing for my next birthday,

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    (cake that is).



    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-59882444 - but to save you the trouble:
    It wasn't because they were gay, it was because they wanted an erect penis in pink icing on the cake.

    Leave a comment:


  • mattster
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    It's a very old case but IIRC (anyone?) the 'customer' targeted the bakery knowing it would cause ructions, they didn't innocently order a cake and get refused.
    Yes, from memory I believe this was a targeted stunt knowing that this would be the likely outcome. Knowing that, I have very little sympathy with the complainant.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    It's a very old case but IIRC (anyone?) the 'customer' targeted the bakery knowing it would cause ructions, they didn't innocently order a cake and get refused.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

    Seems odd to me as well. It was highlighted in the case that it is the cake not the person. They didn't not serve him because he was gay, they wouldn't have made the cake if a straight person had ordered it either so they didn't discriminate against the gay person ordering it. This is purely down to the message on the cake so I can't see a problem with them refusing to print the message, be it gay marriage or something untasteful or obscene. I'm sure any baker of any faith would have a problem making a cake with a slogan on that is against their religious beliefs. If I ordered a cake from a Muslim or Jewish bakers that said 'I love pork pies' am I being discriminated against when they kick me out? No I'm not. I've just picked the wrong business for my requirements and I move on to to the next one that will. Maybe a bit of an extreme example as the gay marriage one is borderline in this day and age but the principle is still sound.
    That is a good point. It was the message on the cake, not the person requesting the cake, that was being refused.

    If Mr Lee had asked for "Happy Birthday Brian" and the bakery refused because they didn't want to serve a gay person then there'd be a case.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Agree with LM. When it a case of one person's rights against another's we should surely take account of personal space. The baker should not be forced to do something against his own beliefs.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    I struggle to see this as a discrimination case. Even though religious beliefs were the reason for refusing to make the cake, there is nothing that says a company is required sell you one of their products on demand.

    It seems to me that Mr Lee is discriminating against the bakery for refusing consider their religious and political beliefs. Perhaps if people were more understanding of the fact that not everyone has the same beliefs, there'd be less suing and more tolerance.
    Seems odd to me as well. It was highlighted in the case that it is the cake not the person. They didn't not serve him because he was gay, they wouldn't have made the cake if a straight person had ordered it either so they didn't discriminate against the gay person ordering it. This is purely down to the message on the cake so I can't see a problem with them refusing to print the message, be it gay marriage or something untasteful or obscene. I'm sure any baker of any faith would have a problem making a cake with a slogan on that is against their religious beliefs. If I ordered a cake from a Muslim or Jewish bakers that said 'I love pork pies' am I being discriminated against when they kick me out? No I'm not. I've just picked the wrong business for my requirements and I move on to to the next one that will. Maybe a bit of an extreme example as the gay marriage one is borderline in this day and age but the principle is still sound.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    I heard the headline then eventually heard this:
    "Because he had failed to exhaust domestic remedies, the application was inadmissible," it added.

    What a waste of bloody money taking to the European Court of Human Rights.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X