• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "£1MM a day consultants"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post

    I disagree. I come from an engineering background. Everything is done by powers to the multiple of 3.

    Something x 10^3 is a thousand somethings
    x 10^6 is a million things
    x 10^9 a billion
    x 10^12 a trillion

    makes far more sense and demonstrates that despite the US sticking to 'imperial' measures that aren't even imperial, they do have some useful ideas.
    Indeed. Even now, a million million is rarely a number we use outside of pure science or (recently) IT. How would we whinge about billionaires if there aren't any?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post

    No idea what you're talking about.
    Neither did the developers.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post

    Sort your HTML / BBCode out!
    No idea what you're talking about.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    It was a sad day in 1974 when Harold Wilson confirmed that the UK would use the short scale definition of a billion due to increasing use and influence by the USA and its inability to handle big numbers.
    I disagree. I come from an engineering background. Everything is done by powers to the multiple of 3.

    Something x 10^3 is a thousand somethings
    x 10^6 is a million things
    x 10^9 a billion
    x 10^12 a trillion

    makes far more sense and demonstrates that despite the US sticking to 'imperial' measures that aren't even imperial, they do have some useful ideas.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by NowPermOutsideUK View Post
    As reported here in authoritative newspaper

    rates must be going up! of October it employed 1,230 consultants. Test and trace has average daily contractor rates of £1,100

    note 1100 a day is average !

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...on-consultants
    you are assuming that the individual worker is getting that money. That is a very poor assumption and almost certainly wrong.

    Are you aware of consultancy firms like Accenture, Cap Gemini, Deloitte's, etc? If you are then you know why your assumption is dumb.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    sounds like a mouthful!

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    https://ucum.org/ucum.html

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Nope.

    Standard prefixes for the metric units of measure (multiples)
    [TR]
    Prefix nameN/Adeca-hecto-kilo-mega-giga-tera-peta-exa-zetta-yotta-[/TR]
    [TR]
    Prefix symbol[TD][/TD]
    [TD]da-[/TD]
    [TD]h-[/TD]
    [TD]k-[/TD]
    [TD]M-[/TD]
    [TD]G-[/TD]
    [TD]T-[/TD]
    [TD]P-[/TD]
    [TD]E-[/TD]
    [TD]Z-[/TD]
    [TD]Y-[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    Factor[TD]100[/TD]
    [TD]101[/TD]
    [TD]102[/TD]
    [TD]103[/TD]
    [TD]106[/TD]
    [TD]109[/TD]
    [TD]1012[/TD]
    [TD]1015[/TD]
    [TD]1018[/TD]
    [TD]1021[/TD]
    [TD]1024[/TD]
    [/TR]


    Sort your HTML / BBCode out!

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by NigelJK View Post
    This is also how the SI units are named, no need for a new name at a thousand million.
    Nope.

    Standard prefixes for the metric units of measure (multiples)

    deca, hecto, kilo, mega, giga, tera, peta, exa, zetta, yotta
    100, 101,102,103,106,109,1012,1015,1018,1021,1024


    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    Linguistically you only use a new term when required, so:
    100x10 is thousand, with 999 being the largest number available in the Hundreds
    1000x1000 is Million, with 999,999 being the largest number available in Thousands
    1,000,000,000,000 is a Billion, with 999,999,999,999 being largest number available in the Millions.

    This is also how the SI units are named, no need for a new name at a thousand million.

    Leave a comment:


  • NowPermOutsideUK
    replied
    The 1100 number is an average rate and includes people I imagine who are taking tests in the car park - Not senior PM / engineer types

    In either case that 1100 a day on avergae is serious money no matter how you look at it

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post

    Deloitte's were charging a reduced rate. They normally stiff the taxpayer for way more than that.
    Back in mid 2000's when I worked for Deloitte they charged me out for much more than that.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post

    To be fair, billions and trillions by the Yank definition are far more commonly encountered orders of magnitude than 10^12 and 10^18.

    So that's one innovation that I think makes sense.
    I thought it went back to Latin - you had 4 levels
    I
    X
    C
    M
    Then after that it repeated, but you didn't go up a level until you had used all the lower ones.
    The American way only uses 3 levels when you get beyond one thousand.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    It was a sad day in 1974 when Harold Wilson confirmed that the UK would use the short scale definition of a billion due to increasing use and influence by the USA and its inability to handle big numbers.
    To be fair, billions and trillions by the Yank definition are far more commonly encountered orders of magnitude than 10^12 and 10^18.

    So that's one innovation that I think makes sense.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by anonymouse View Post
    Wow, only £1,100 a day, charge rates have really dropped then.
    Deloitte's were charging a reduced rate. They normally stiff the taxpayer for way more than that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X