Originally posted by Lance
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: £1MM a day consultants
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "£1MM a day consultants"
Collapse
-
Indeed. Even now, a million million is rarely a number we use outside of pure science or (recently) IT. How would we whinge about billionaires if there aren't any?
-
No idea what you're talking about.Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
Sort your HTML / BBCode out!
Leave a comment:
-
I disagree. I come from an engineering background. Everything is done by powers to the multiple of 3.Originally posted by ladymuck View PostIt was a sad day in 1974 when Harold Wilson confirmed that the UK would use the short scale definition of a billion due to increasing use and influence by the USA and its inability to handle big numbers.
Something x 10^3 is a thousand somethings
x 10^6 is a million things
x 10^9 a billion
x 10^12 a trillion
makes far more sense and demonstrates that despite the US sticking to 'imperial' measures that aren't even imperial, they do have some useful ideas.
Leave a comment:
-
you are assuming that the individual worker is getting that money. That is a very poor assumption and almost certainly wrong.Originally posted by NowPermOutsideUK View PostAs reported here in authoritative newspaper
rates must be going up! of October it employed 1,230 consultants. Test and trace has average daily contractor rates of £1,100
note 1100 a day is average !
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...on-consultants
Are you aware of consultancy firms like Accenture, Cap Gemini, Deloitte's, etc? If you are then you know why your assumption is dumb.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Sort your HTML / BBCode out!Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostNope.
Standard prefixes for the metric units of measure (multiples)
[TR]
Prefix nameN/Adeca-hecto-kilo-mega-giga-tera-peta-exa-zetta-yotta-[/TR]
[TR]
Prefix symbol[TD][/TD]
[TD]da-[/TD]
[TD]h-[/TD]
[TD]k-[/TD]
[TD]M-[/TD]
[TD]G-[/TD]
[TD]T-[/TD]
[TD]P-[/TD]
[TD]E-[/TD]
[TD]Z-[/TD]
[TD]Y-[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
Factor[TD]100[/TD]
[TD]101[/TD]
[TD]102[/TD]
[TD]103[/TD]
[TD]106[/TD]
[TD]109[/TD]
[TD]1012[/TD]
[TD]1015[/TD]
[TD]1018[/TD]
[TD]1021[/TD]
[TD]1024[/TD]
[/TR]
Leave a comment:
-
Nope.Originally posted by NigelJK View PostThis is also how the SI units are named, no need for a new name at a thousand million.
Standard prefixes for the metric units of measure (multiples)
deca, hecto, kilo, mega, giga, tera, peta, exa, zetta, yotta
100, 101,102,103,106,109,1012,1015,1018,1021,1024
Leave a comment:
-
Linguistically you only use a new term when required, so:
100x10 is thousand, with 999 being the largest number available in the Hundreds
1000x1000 is Million, with 999,999 being the largest number available in Thousands
1,000,000,000,000 is a Billion, with 999,999,999,999 being largest number available in the Millions.
This is also how the SI units are named, no need for a new name at a thousand million.
Leave a comment:
-
The 1100 number is an average rate and includes people I imagine who are taking tests in the car park - Not senior PM / engineer types
In either case that 1100 a day on avergae is serious money no matter how you look at it
Leave a comment:
-
I thought it went back to Latin - you had 4 levelsOriginally posted by OwlHoot View Post
To be fair, billions and trillions by the Yank definition are far more commonly encountered orders of magnitude than 10^12 and 10^18.
So that's one innovation that I think makes sense.
I
X
C
M
Then after that it repeated, but you didn't go up a level until you had used all the lower ones.
The American way only uses 3 levels when you get beyond one thousand.
Leave a comment:
-
To be fair, billions and trillions by the Yank definition are far more commonly encountered orders of magnitude than 10^12 and 10^18.Originally posted by ladymuck View PostIt was a sad day in 1974 when Harold Wilson confirmed that the UK would use the short scale definition of a billion due to increasing use and influence by the USA and its inability to handle big numbers.
So that's one innovation that I think makes sense.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: