• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Expensing my laptop is benefit in kind..."

Collapse

  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by fidot View Post

    That has been my experience
    Which has been the clients choice and nothing to do with your tax position. They also give them to outside contractors and to perms so hardly a bench mark for anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • fidot
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

    How come we are over a two years since all this started and over a month since the legislation came in to force and people still say stuff like this?
    That has been my experience

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by gizzmo View Post

    Thats is not how it works now - previously you didn't have a benefit in kind hit on your tax bill, thus reducing your personal allowances etc. And I don't agree with the charge of 15% that Parasol take as a cut for processing your business costs

    If the client isn't providing hardware then you should be able to offset the full amount - not just 85%
    Parasol is doing the best it can to solve a problem for you that frankly isn't theirs to deal with (most umbrellas avoid this area like the plague for there be dragons if even a little bit is screwed up).

    So a simple question:-

    Is it still cheaper to purchase (i.e. you end up with slightly more money) using this scheme or is it cheaper to buy the laptop out of post tax income?

    I suspect it's still the former....
    Last edited by eek; 17 May 2021, 10:39.

    Leave a comment:


  • gizzmo
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post

    What's complex about it

    You buy laptop

    You send invoice to parasol - they send you 85% of the money before dealing with the Tax calculations.

    You pay the rest out of your final payment as you leave parasol

    I can't see the complexity there
    Thats is not how it works now - previously you didn't have a benefit in kind hit on your tax bill, thus reducing your personal allowances etc. And I don't agree with the charge of 15% that Parasol take as a cut for processing your business costs

    If the client isn't providing hardware then you should be able to offset the full amount - not just 85%

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by gizzmo View Post
    I am on on inside gig and the client is not providing any laptops anymore - all access is now via your own equipment and VDI (Virtual Display via Citrix). My own laptop is quite old but more than adequate for my personal needs - however really struggling with the client's VDI set up requirements so I am going to have to upgrade for the sake of this job. In this instance its a Business cost directly related to the project. If I wasn't doing this gig I wouldn't have need to upgrade my laptop.
    I am also with Parasol - as far as I understand it - the 15% which you previously would have paid at the end of the contract to keep the hardware is the amount that is the benefit in kind. However the 85% they pay you when you submit the receipt for the laptop comes out of your invoice value and is still free of income tax and NI.
    It seems all to complicated so I am just not going to bother with claiming and pay for it myself.
    What's complex about it

    You buy laptop

    You send invoice to parasol - they send you 85% of the money before dealing with the Tax calculations.

    You pay the rest out of your final payment as you leave parasol

    I can't see the complexity there

    Leave a comment:


  • gizzmo
    replied
    I am on on inside gig and the client is not providing any laptops anymore - all access is now via your own equipment and VDI (Virtual Display via Citrix). My own laptop is quite old but more than adequate for my personal needs - however really struggling with the client's VDI set up requirements so I am going to have to upgrade for the sake of this job. In this instance its a Business cost directly related to the project. If I wasn't doing this gig I wouldn't have need to upgrade my laptop.
    I am also with Parasol - as far as I understand it - the 15% which you previously would have paid at the end of the contract to keep the hardware is the amount that is the benefit in kind. However the 85% they pay you when you submit the receipt for the laptop comes out of your invoice value and is still free of income tax and NI.
    It seems all to complicated so I am just not going to bother with claiming and pay for it myself.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Yep, my brother was an aerospace engineer - he had Snap-On kit because he said that his employer supplied monkey-metal tools.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post

    It's also not true - I'm aware of whole heaps of mechanics who have their own toolkit either because their employer doesn't provide one or because what their employer provides is the wrong brand...
    in the building trade it is expected that the workers provide all their own tools. Even permies...

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

    How come we are over a two years since all this started and over a month since the legislation came in to force and people still say stuff like this?
    It's also not true - I'm aware of whole heaps of mechanics who have their own toolkit either because their employer doesn't provide one or because what their employer provides is the wrong brand...

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by fidot View Post
    Surely, for an inside gig, the client provides equipment, so the question is moot.
    How come we are over a two years since all this started and over a month since the legislation came in to force and people still say stuff like this?

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Anything you need for your job that isn't provided by the employer can be offset against tax.

    https://www.gov.uk/tax-relief-for-em...ther-equipment

    HMRC doesn't discriminate between employees and the self-employed. The fact is that mostly equipment is provided by the employer, however an inside IR35 contract isn't really an employment contract.
    Last edited by BlasterBates; 15 May 2021, 13:26.

    Leave a comment:


  • fidot
    replied
    Surely, for an inside gig, the client provides equipment, so the question is moot.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    More of simes' posts removed. simes - you posted on this thread solely to make a snarky comment concerning NLUK. Trolling in the professional forum is not permitted. Don't do it again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    Off-topic posts removed.
    you missed one https://forums.contractoruk.com/acco...ml#post2874450

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

    I was taking the OP and his context in to account where he wanted to expense a laptop where he could outside, he can't inside. My comment was directly related to his question and situation, not to pull apart the entire expenses legislation.

    I've altered my original comment to add a little more clarity.
    And as you would note from my first reply while the way Parasol was offering hardware / laptops was dubious if you actually looked at the IR35 rules in detail, even today (post April 6th 2021) it is allowable for the cost of project materials to be claimed from pre tax income. And Parasol were (at least up to last week) happy to call a laptop a project expense - to use money from an invoice to purchase it for you and then sell it to you at the end of the project.

    the only thing Parasol was doing was pushing the definition of project materials beyond a point other umbrellas (not just clarity) were happy with but that is the nature of a lot of umbrella companies as they have a different viewpoint of what is right and wrong than other people may have given that a number started out when IR35 first appeared.
    Last edited by eek; 9 April 2021, 15:37.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X