- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
WTF...
Collapse
X
-
-
WTF? I followed a Mich link and there was NO totty! Standards are slipping at cuk. I demand an immediate ban to be terminated only when he promises to post up some picture of the women's rugby team. Naked. Or something. -
For BP, not rugby or volleyball, but this time handball; the newly contracted ladies at a local handball team.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostWTF? I followed a Mich link and there was NO totty! Standards are slipping at cuk. I demand an immediate ban to be terminated only when he promises to post up some picture of the women's rugby team. Naked. Or something.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
-
Fussy git.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI think I need a lie down!
BTW my preference is 3, 2, 4, 1.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Yeah well we all know you would be arranging numbers 1-5. 1 for the ball and 2-5 for the women.....Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostFussy git.
Comment
-
-
Well of course I'd have to get warmed up for them; I'm an athlete, me. Not like the rest of these fatty lardarses on CUK.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostYeah well we all know you would be arranging numbers 1-5. 1 for the ball and 2-5 for the women.....
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Any healthy bloke would.Originally posted by vetran View Postforget Mitch, I would!
By the way, the one on the right is about 6'2, which might intimidate some of you fatty shortarses.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Today 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Yesterday 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22

Comment