- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
WTF...
Collapse
X
-
-
WTF? I followed a Mich link and there was NO totty! Standards are slipping at cuk. I demand an immediate ban to be terminated only when he promises to post up some picture of the women's rugby team. Naked. Or something. -
For BP, not rugby or volleyball, but this time handball; the newly contracted ladies at a local handball team.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostWTF? I followed a Mich link and there was NO totty! Standards are slipping at cuk. I demand an immediate ban to be terminated only when he promises to post up some picture of the women's rugby team. Naked. Or something.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
-
Fussy git.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI think I need a lie down!
BTW my preference is 3, 2, 4, 1.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Yeah well we all know you would be arranging numbers 1-5. 1 for the ball and 2-5 for the women.....Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostFussy git.
Comment
-
-
Well of course I'd have to get warmed up for them; I'm an athlete, me. Not like the rest of these fatty lardarses on CUK.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostYeah well we all know you would be arranging numbers 1-5. 1 for the ball and 2-5 for the women.....
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Any healthy bloke would.Originally posted by vetran View Postforget Mitch, I would!
By the way, the one on the right is about 6'2, which might intimidate some of you fatty shortarses.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Cookie Policy Today 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Today 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Yesterday 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Jul 6 08:20
- HMRC abandons PGMOL football referees case: Are contractors and IR35 hit? Jul 2 05:09
- Crypto tax and contractors: What HMRC’s new cryptoasset research really means Jul 1 04:03
- Crypto Tax and Contractors: What HMRC's New Cryptoasset Research Really Means Jul 1 04:03

Comment