- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
WTF...
Collapse
X
-
-
WTF? I followed a Mich link and there was NO totty! Standards are slipping at cuk. I demand an immediate ban to be terminated only when he promises to post up some picture of the women's rugby team. Naked. Or something. -
For BP, not rugby or volleyball, but this time handball; the newly contracted ladies at a local handball team.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostWTF? I followed a Mich link and there was NO totty! Standards are slipping at cuk. I demand an immediate ban to be terminated only when he promises to post up some picture of the women's rugby team. Naked. Or something.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
-
Fussy git.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI think I need a lie down!
BTW my preference is 3, 2, 4, 1.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Yeah well we all know you would be arranging numbers 1-5. 1 for the ball and 2-5 for the women.....Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostFussy git.
Comment
-
-
Well of course I'd have to get warmed up for them; I'm an athlete, me. Not like the rest of these fatty lardarses on CUK.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostYeah well we all know you would be arranging numbers 1-5. 1 for the ball and 2-5 for the women.....
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Any healthy bloke would.Originally posted by vetran View Postforget Mitch, I would!
By the way, the one on the right is about 6'2, which might intimidate some of you fatty shortarses.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Dividends in 2026/27: an expert’s explainer for contractors Mar 13 07:20
- Contracting Awards 2026 opens for entries — with new AI category Mar 12 07:26
- Contractors, beware these four traps in the UK’s Statutory Residence Test Mar 11 00:23
- ‘Stable’ IT contractor demand moved near growth in February 2026 Mar 10 06:49
- What is a tax-efficient salary for 2026/27 as a limited company director? Mar 9 06:23
- Why the McCann Review is the latest failure of the Loan Charge scandal Mar 6 06:53
- What did Spring Statement 2026 say about mortgages? Mar 5 07:29
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Mar 4 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Mar 3 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Mar 3 07:45

Comment