- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
WTF...
Collapse
X
-
-
WTF? I followed a Mich link and there was NO totty! Standards are slipping at cuk. I demand an immediate ban to be terminated only when he promises to post up some picture of the women's rugby team. Naked. Or something. -
For BP, not rugby or volleyball, but this time handball; the newly contracted ladies at a local handball team.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostWTF? I followed a Mich link and there was NO totty! Standards are slipping at cuk. I demand an immediate ban to be terminated only when he promises to post up some picture of the women's rugby team. Naked. Or something.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
-
Fussy git.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI think I need a lie down!
BTW my preference is 3, 2, 4, 1.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Yeah well we all know you would be arranging numbers 1-5. 1 for the ball and 2-5 for the women.....Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostFussy git.
Comment
-
-
Well of course I'd have to get warmed up for them; I'm an athlete, me. Not like the rest of these fatty lardarses on CUK.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostYeah well we all know you would be arranging numbers 1-5. 1 for the ball and 2-5 for the women.....
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Any healthy bloke would.Originally posted by vetran View Postforget Mitch, I would!
By the way, the one on the right is about 6'2, which might intimidate some of you fatty shortarses.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Today 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Yesterday 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42

Comment