- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Online Safety Act
Collapse
X
-
-
Thing is, the guys who are protesting about it because of porn, are skipping the bits about it also applying to websites that children would have access to that promote suicide, self harm and terrorism.
Should we prevent children from being exposed to sites trying to indoctrinate them into terrorism? Lord Toby Young (whose party brought the bill in the first place), Nigel Farage, and many others of their ilk think we should not prevent it. They will backtrack and say something different should be done, safe in the knowledge that they will never be asked to draft up the legislation to deliver the "something different", but can come up with some simple slogan to deflect from doing anything.
…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Especially if it's in the waiting roomOriginally posted by xoggoth View PostThis will have a negative impact on mens' prostate health. A **** a day keeps the doctor away.Comment
-
The law isn't working, I did a quick check and there's loads of still images of sexy origin in plain sight along with foreign based xxx sites that probably don't know this legislation exists and don't care anyway. Are they going to put the whole internet behind age verification?Comment
-
aye, - right!Originally posted by tazdevil View PostThe law isn't working, I did a quick check
a quick check.
sure.He who Hingeth aboot, Getteth Hee Haw. https://forums.contractoruk.com/core...ies/smokin.gifComment
-
-
I guess these sites eventually end up on an IP blacklist? Although some of them are IP blacklisted due to copyright takedowns and quite used to hopping over to a new address.Originally posted by tazdevil View PostThe law isn't working, I did a quick check and there's loads of still images of sexy origin in plain sight along with foreign based xxx sites that probably don't know this legislation exists and don't care anyway. Are they going to put the whole internet behind age verification?
I think you are right though - kids probably know better than parents how to set up a VPN anyway. But maybe it will do something to help with under aged images, suicide, self harm etc. TikTok isn't it that is notorious for serving up self harm images, even when the user does not specifically look for them? At least if there is a law, there is a recourse for the authorities do force them to stop doing that, because they have been asking nicely for a long time and not getting anywhere.Comment
-
There are now loads of sites generating fake IDs, driving licence pictures etc all for free; the online safety act is broken.Originally posted by willendure View Post
I guess these sites eventually end up on an IP blacklist? Although some of them are IP blacklisted due to copyright takedowns and quite used to hopping over to a new address.
I think you are right though - kids probably know better than parents how to set up a VPN anyway. But maybe it will do something to help with under aged images, suicide, self harm etc. TikTok isn't it that is notorious for serving up self harm images, even when the user does not specifically look for them? At least if there is a law, there is a recourse for the authorities do force them to stop doing that, because they have been asking nicely for a long time and not getting anywhere.
"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
It is a ridiculous law when even Wikipedia could be on the hook for demanding age verification. They had a hearing on 22/23 July but I can't find what the outcome was.Comment
-
They do have porn that's out of copyright. So I'm told of course...Originally posted by ladymuck View PostIt is a ridiculous law when even Wikipedia could be on the hook for demanding age verification. They had a hearing on 22/23 July but I can't find what the outcome was.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36


Comment