- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Online Safety Act
Collapse
X
-
-
Thing is, the guys who are protesting about it because of porn, are skipping the bits about it also applying to websites that children would have access to that promote suicide, self harm and terrorism.
Should we prevent children from being exposed to sites trying to indoctrinate them into terrorism? Lord Toby Young (whose party brought the bill in the first place), Nigel Farage, and many others of their ilk think we should not prevent it. They will backtrack and say something different should be done, safe in the knowledge that they will never be asked to draft up the legislation to deliver the "something different", but can come up with some simple slogan to deflect from doing anything.
…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Especially if it's in the waiting roomOriginally posted by xoggoth View PostThis will have a negative impact on mens' prostate health. A **** a day keeps the doctor away.Comment
-
The law isn't working, I did a quick check and there's loads of still images of sexy origin in plain sight along with foreign based xxx sites that probably don't know this legislation exists and don't care anyway. Are they going to put the whole internet behind age verification?Comment
-
aye, - right!Originally posted by tazdevil View PostThe law isn't working, I did a quick check
a quick check.
sure.He who Hingeth aboot, Getteth Hee Haw. https://forums.contractoruk.com/core...ies/smokin.gifComment
-
-
I guess these sites eventually end up on an IP blacklist? Although some of them are IP blacklisted due to copyright takedowns and quite used to hopping over to a new address.Originally posted by tazdevil View PostThe law isn't working, I did a quick check and there's loads of still images of sexy origin in plain sight along with foreign based xxx sites that probably don't know this legislation exists and don't care anyway. Are they going to put the whole internet behind age verification?
I think you are right though - kids probably know better than parents how to set up a VPN anyway. But maybe it will do something to help with under aged images, suicide, self harm etc. TikTok isn't it that is notorious for serving up self harm images, even when the user does not specifically look for them? At least if there is a law, there is a recourse for the authorities do force them to stop doing that, because they have been asking nicely for a long time and not getting anywhere.Comment
-
There are now loads of sites generating fake IDs, driving licence pictures etc all for free; the online safety act is broken.Originally posted by willendure View Post
I guess these sites eventually end up on an IP blacklist? Although some of them are IP blacklisted due to copyright takedowns and quite used to hopping over to a new address.
I think you are right though - kids probably know better than parents how to set up a VPN anyway. But maybe it will do something to help with under aged images, suicide, self harm etc. TikTok isn't it that is notorious for serving up self harm images, even when the user does not specifically look for them? At least if there is a law, there is a recourse for the authorities do force them to stop doing that, because they have been asking nicely for a long time and not getting anywhere.
"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
It is a ridiculous law when even Wikipedia could be on the hook for demanding age verification. They had a hearing on 22/23 July but I can't find what the outcome was.Comment
-
They do have porn that's out of copyright. So I'm told of course...Originally posted by ladymuck View PostIt is a ridiculous law when even Wikipedia could be on the hook for demanding age verification. They had a hearing on 22/23 July but I can't find what the outcome was.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Crypto tax and contractors: What HMRC’s new cryptoasset research really means Today 04:03
- Crypto Tax and Contractors: What HMRC's New Cryptoasset Research Really Means Today 04:03
- Profit and loss accounts set for public filing at Companies House from 2028 — what it means for your contractor business Yesterday 03:38
- UK IT Contractors: How to land Forward Deployed Engineer roles beyond Palantir, Anthropic and OpenAI Jun 29 05:52
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 25 03:52
- The beginning of the end for Boox ‘MSC’ contractors has begun. Check back in 2031 Jun 24 06:25
- Andy Burnham as prime minister ‘would cut both ways for self-employed contractors’ Jun 23 02:18
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 22 15:52
- Taxman tells contractors that only four new tax avoidance schemes needed avoiding in Q2 Jun 22 05:47
- VAT compliance checks are changing — here’s what contractors need to know Jun 17 07:30


Comment