Originally posted by DaveB
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Boris Johnson tests positive for Covid
Collapse
X
-
-
Since he has admitted attending, I can't see what else he can say if he isn't willing to resign.Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
I think he's actually made it worse, if that were possible.
To borrow these immortal words from twitter: "I believed implicitly that this was a work event."
In the interest of balance, Keir's attempt to label this a "boozy party" is quite obviously a tactic. The photos I saw showed a few tables of 3-4 people dotted about, having a glass of wine. If you think of a "boozy party" involving Tories you picture roast pigs, white powder and someone getting buggered in the bushes. It's not like it ended with them doing the conga with their trousers round their ankles... about the ****est party I've ever seen
None of this matters though, it's clearly utterly against the spirit of the rules regardless if you can wheedle your way out on a technicality. Nobody has a leg to stand on.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
It's effectively all one building behind the doors and the gardens are shared.Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
He lives at 11 doesn't he? So not his private address - his office address.
Doesn't alter the fact that this was a very carefully worded statement written for him by lawyers with the express intent of limiting his personal liability in any way possible."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Oh, a catch-22 for sure. He could either provide a fulsome apology, which might admit too much that could eventually scupper him, or he could provide a weak apology (he went for that option), which will not stem the tide of complaints from constituents to Tory MPs or push this off the front pages, which will eventually scupper him. At this point, he's done for, but I think he made things a little bit worse by couching the language so badly - it was sorry, not sorry.Originally posted by d000hg View PostSince he has admitted attending, I can't see what else he can say if he isn't willing to resign.Comment
-
-
No, Number 10 is his official residence. The flat is above No 11 but not part of it (If you've ever been inside Downing Street, it' a total maze spread over about five separate buildings, so boundaries are a little moot).Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
He lives at 11 doesn't he? So not his private address - his office address.
More to the point, it is not a public space either (none of Downing Street is) so the regulations (not law!) everyone is banging on about probably don't apply anyway. He's broken guidelines, not laws.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
That seems very likely, however it probably doesn't make much difference since we were 'told' to follow guidance not asked in all those #10 briefings, and this is politics.Originally posted by malvolio View PostHe's broken guidelines, not laws.
I would imagine many of us here have done things along these lines, albeit probably with a handful of people rather than 30-100. But you just can't be so dumb as a government as to do it so openly. If Boris and Hancock had a couple of drinks after work discussing matters of the day then realistically, fine. But don't invite 100 people "because they've been working so hard" when everyone else's only interaction with each other is when they stood on their doorsteps banging pans for the NHSOriginally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Ah that's fine then, nothing to see here, move along.Originally posted by malvolio View PostHe's broken guidelines, not laws.
Comment
-
Close. A member of his family (could be one of many):
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59979118
...allegedly…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
I just heardOriginally posted by WTFH View PostClose. A member of his family (could be one of many):
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59979118
...allegedly
Must be Carrie.
You don't test babies or toddlers unless you have to.
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50
- “I’m not a Machiavellian overlord”: Adrian Sacco breaks his silence on the Contractor Loan Recalls Aug 13 06:50

Comment