• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Boris Johnson tests positive for Covid

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    Professional Lawyers opinion on it.

    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...570390021.html
    He lives at 11 doesn't he? So not his private address - his office address.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

      I think he's actually made it worse, if that were possible.

      To borrow these immortal words from twitter: "I believed implicitly that this was a work event."
      Since he has admitted attending, I can't see what else he can say if he isn't willing to resign.

      In the interest of balance, Keir's attempt to label this a "boozy party" is quite obviously a tactic. The photos I saw showed a few tables of 3-4 people dotted about, having a glass of wine. If you think of a "boozy party" involving Tories you picture roast pigs, white powder and someone getting buggered in the bushes. It's not like it ended with them doing the conga with their trousers round their ankles... about the ****est party I've ever seen

      None of this matters though, it's clearly utterly against the spirit of the rules regardless if you can wheedle your way out on a technicality. Nobody has a leg to stand on.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by mudskipper View Post

        He lives at 11 doesn't he? So not his private address - his office address.
        It's effectively all one building behind the doors and the gardens are shared.

        Doesn't alter the fact that this was a very carefully worded statement written for him by lawyers with the express intent of limiting his personal liability in any way possible.
        "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          Since he has admitted attending, I can't see what else he can say if he isn't willing to resign.
          Oh, a catch-22 for sure. He could either provide a fulsome apology, which might admit too much that could eventually scupper him, or he could provide a weak apology (he went for that option), which will not stem the tide of complaints from constituents to Tory MPs or push this off the front pages, which will eventually scupper him. At this point, he's done for, but I think he made things a little bit worse by couching the language so badly - it was sorry, not sorry.

          Comment


            #25
            He'll be just fine

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by mudskipper View Post

              He lives at 11 doesn't he? So not his private address - his office address.
              No, Number 10 is his official residence. The flat is above No 11 but not part of it (If you've ever been inside Downing Street, it' a total maze spread over about five separate buildings, so boundaries are a little moot).

              More to the point, it is not a public space either (none of Downing Street is) so the regulations (not law!) everyone is banging on about probably don't apply anyway. He's broken guidelines, not laws.
              Blog? What blog...?

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by malvolio View Post
                He's broken guidelines, not laws.
                That seems very likely, however it probably doesn't make much difference since we were 'told' to follow guidance not asked in all those #10 briefings, and this is politics.

                I would imagine many of us here have done things along these lines, albeit probably with a handful of people rather than 30-100. But you just can't be so dumb as a government as to do it so openly. If Boris and Hancock had a couple of drinks after work discussing matters of the day then realistically, fine. But don't invite 100 people "because they've been working so hard" when everyone else's only interaction with each other is when they stood on their doorsteps banging pans for the NHS
                Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                Originally posted by vetran
                Urine is quite nourishing

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by malvolio View Post
                  He's broken guidelines, not laws.
                  Ah that's fine then, nothing to see here, move along.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Close. A member of his family (could be one of many):
                    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59979118

                    ...allegedly
                    …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                      Close. A member of his family (could be one of many):
                      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59979118

                      ...allegedly
                      I just heard

                      Must be Carrie.

                      ​​​​​​You don't test babies or toddlers unless you have to.
                      "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X