Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The irony is you are complaining their claims are unprovable after spending days demanding they disprove your own claims.
My "claims" in response to Whorty's assertion norther voters would be mad to vote for the Conservatives because of their expense fiddling etc included records of court or parliamentary proceedings proving more Labour MPs were prosecuted for fiddling expenses.
The response was to accuse the Government of Xenophobia , I quite reasonably asked for proof of Xenophobic actions, the best I got was the opinion of John Bercow - I would have more respect for a roll of Andrex.
Sadly it seems you have trouble understanding.
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.
...The response was to accuse the Government of Xenophobia , I quite reasonably asked for proof of Xenophobic actions....
Except that wasn't the accusation.
Worth said there were xenophobes in the government.
Not that all the government was guilty of xenophobia, or that all the government had committed xenophobic actions.
You then tried to spin and twist you way out of it getting to the point where you said that people were accusing you of something that you say no one (including you) can prove, but that the accusation is "in their eyes" - quite an impressive feat with no photographic evidence of my eyes.
Worth said there were xenophobes in the government.
Not that all the government was guilty of xenophobia, or that all the government had committed xenophobic actions.
You then tried to spin and twist you way out of it getting to the point where you said that people were accusing you of something that you say no one (including you) can prove, but that the accusation is "in their eyes" - quite an impressive feat with no photographic evidence of my eyes.
So an accusation then? Did you prove it?
I reckon I proved a lack of Xenophobia in the cabinet by the pictures. Beats bulltulip Bercow.
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.
You were provided a link to an article in the Spectator (former editor Boris Johnson) written by the wife of a Tory MP. But you rejected that because it proved you wrong.
You then took the Boris path of deflection and changing the subject.
You have argued that a picture of the cabinet is proof of a lack of xenophobia, all I see is a bunch of British citizens sitting round a table. No foreigners there.
Or are you saying xenophobia and racism are the same?
You were provided a link to an article in the Spectator (former editor Boris Johnson) written by the wife of a Tory MP. But you rejected that because it proved you wrong.
You then took the Boris path of deflection and changing the subject.
You have argued that a picture of the cabinet is proof of a lack of xenophobia, all I see is a bunch of British citizens sitting round a table. No foreigners there.
Or are you saying xenophobia and racism are the same?
Missed that, which post is that?
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.
Comment