Originally posted by lorakeen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
My contract is finally ending YAY!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!! -
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
Looking at your other post in the Prof forums I'm wondering if it's you that needs the attitude check and not everyone else around you.
1 example, frequently changing specifications - the answer is No, its not in the plan for this sprint, and we will discuss this change at the next sprint planning meeting where we can prioritise work.
Equally, 3 weekly releases could easily create a change management nightmare. I know places that do that and it requires a lot of change management handholding to ensure it works properly.Last edited by eek; 12 August 2021, 09:41.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by eek View Post
+1 - a lot of the items sound like issues that should have been addressed way earlier or must have been reinstated due to issues down the line.
1 example, frequently changing specifications - the answer is No, its not in the plan for this sprint, and we will discuss this change at the next sprint planning meeting where we can prioritise work.
Equally, 3 weekly releases could easily create a change management nightmare. I know places that do that and it requires a lot of change management handholding to ensure it works properly.
The 3 weekly releases worked for us, because we have a severe QA bottleneck.
Which is why we achieved more in the period we used it than in the 2 years prior. But we never got to finish things, because Her Highness knew better.
The many previous issues were never discussed because the big boss never felt like it. He wanted cheap and fast and they did cheap and fast for 10 years and then "I wonder why our code is bad quality and spaghetti".
The PM wanted things her way- and the boss had her back. People are moved around at the new stuff while the ongoing projects are left as lower priority and then "I wonder why it takes so long".
I don't care anymore. Everything is a mess and the people above are sick and tired of throwing money at a project that has become the PM's opportunity to prove why she isn't a failed coder.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lorakeen View PostI don't care anymore. Everything is a mess and the people above are sick and tired of throwing money at a project that has become the PM's opportunity to prove why she isn't a failed coder.
merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by lorakeen View Post
The 3 weekly releases worked for us, because we have a severe QA bottleneck.
Which is why we achieved more in the period we used it than in the 2 years prior. But we never got to finish things, because Her Highness knew better.
The many previous issues were never discussed because the big boss never felt like it. He wanted cheap and fast and they did cheap and fast for 10 years and then "I wonder why our code is bad quality and spaghetti".
The PM wanted things her way- and the boss had her back. People are moved around at the new stuff while the ongoing projects are left as lower priority and then "I wonder why it takes so long".
I don't care anymore. Everything is a mess and the people above are sick and tired of throwing money at a project that has become the PM's opportunity to prove why she isn't a failed coder.
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by eek View Post
Got to agree with NLUK regarding your attitude - that comment reveals a hell of a lot about you...
"I've never seen X" is not an argument.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post
That you on the desk opposite?Comment
-
Originally posted by lorakeen View Post
yes that I find the idea of someone with no experience in the language who's last (junior) coding position was 4 years ago but wants to have the last word on code quality in, again, a language she barely touched utterly ridiculous.
"I've never seen X" is not an argument.
They ARE everywhere aren't they'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
Neither mine, nor ees' comments were a compliment to you. You just aren't seeing it though... and that's part of the problem i.e. you.
.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lorakeen View Post
I am seeing it, I just choose to not engage as I have better things to do.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Comment