- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Dreams of Working From a Beach Risk Turning Into a Tax Nightmare
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Comment
-
another reason to push for outside contracts. pay yourself min wage and keep the rest in the company.
although I would presume the client would want his pound of flesh when offering outside and good money. and min wage will be at 0% so the other jurisdiction might want to tax that.Comment
-
...a Londoner, a New Yorker and a Hong Konger walking into a bar. Let’s say it’s in Rio de Janeiro. They all make the same salary — $100,000 — and have been allowed to work remotely from Brazil for two months.
<snip>
.... who will owe the most in taxes?Comment
-
Originally posted by Paralytic View Post
Did they ask their accountants?I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
Originally posted by Whorty View Post
Makes no difference who pays the most tax ... $100,000 is nowhere near enough to live on. It's all the boomers fault. Salaries should be higher. Can't possibly survive on that.
But, 100k is not a lot by many standards, sure you are in the 5% but would be basically paying bills without having the opportunity to put some money aside or not work for a while.
100k $ is about 72k in £. for that amount you would be poor as f*** in London zone 1-3.
If you have a family and don't get other support or benefits from gov, or wife is not working on similar salary ... you'd be visiting food banks quite often.
The truth is that the current generation is paying rent and exorbitant prices for everything. yeah we have cheap food but that is more likely to kill you than anything else. And tinder & alcohol to drown our sorrows.Comment
-
Originally posted by GigiBronz View Post
No disrespect meant, I've seen you are a decent person and most likely well intended.
But, 100k is not a lot by many standards, sure you are in the 5% but would be basically paying bills without having the opportunity to put some money aside or not work for a while.
100k $ is about 72k in £. for that amount you would be poor as f*** in London zone 1-3.
If you have a family and don't get other support or benefits from gov, or wife is not working on similar salary ... you'd be visiting food banks quite often.
The truth is that the current generation is paying rent and exorbitant prices for everything. yeah we have cheap food but that is more likely to kill you than anything else. And tinder & alcohol to drown our sorrows.
most couples with kids survive quite well on <£50k combined.
Average household budget is £30k.
https://www.nimblefins.co.uk/average...-budget#budget
If you can't put money away on £100k then you seriously need to examine your spending.
I won't go into London because property & travel are so costly & a pain.
Plenty of old people paying stupid rents as well, not everyone bought a property 30 years ago or lost the house in a divorce.Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post
oh do feck off!
most couples with kids survive quite well on <£50k combined.
Average household budget is £30k.
https://www.nimblefins.co.uk/average...-budget#budget
If you can't put money away on £100k then you seriously need to examine your spending.
2 people on < 50k cumulated + benefits are probably better off than 1 100k sole taxpayer.
this society is screwed and even 100k in london is not a lot. GhostofTarbera , can you pitch in with this?Comment
-
Originally posted by GigiBronz View Post
actually you might be better of with <50k + benefits. and 2 tax allowances cumulated are always better than one.
2 people on < 50k cumulated + benefits are probably better off than 1 100k sole taxpayer.
this society is screwed and even 100k in london is not a lot. GhostofTarbera , can you pitch in with this?
£100k after take home is £67k not a bad screw.
Earn £100,000 in 2021/2022 and you'll take home £66,693. This means £5,558 in your pocket a month.
Over the year you'll pay £27,428 income tax and £5,879 in National Insurance.Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Today 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Comment