2 things.'You' are not integrating into their Society. Secondly you could also have posted a picture of the Nuremberg Rallies.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Boris puts his foot in it
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by NigelJK View Post2 things.'You' are not integrating into their Society. Secondly you could also have posted a picture of the Nuremberg Rallies.
When the fun stops, STOP.Comment
-
The two are mutually exclusive; you can have a problem with both.Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
Comment
-
Why do gammonflakes get so up-tight about burqas?
Originally posted by Henry StewartNo woman in a burqa (or a hijab or a burkini) has ever done me any harm. But I was sacked (without explanation) by a man in a suit.
Men in suits missold me pensions and endowments, costing me thousands of pounds.
A man in a suit led us on a disastrous and illegal war.
Men in suits led the banks and crashed the world economy. Other men in suits then increased the misery to millions through austerity.
If we are to start telling people what to wear, maybe we should ban suits.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
It's even more basic than that.Originally posted by WTFH View PostWhy do gammonflakes get so up-tight about burqas?
On one side we have men telling women what they should wear based on cultural ideology and on the other we have men telling women what they should not wear based on cultural ideology.
How about we shut up and let women decide what they want to wear for themselves?"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Now that's another hot topic thought isn't it. They may chose to as it's the way of live they've been brought up, and in some families they don't have the choice at all. And so on....Originally posted by DaveB View Post
How about we shut up and let women decide what they want to wear for themselves?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Exactly my point re the absence of pink frilly ones.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostNow that's another hot topic thought isn't it. They may chose to as it's the way of live they've been brought up, and in some families they don't have the choice at all. And so on....
On a related note, there's an article in today's Grauniad about hookers in India being up in arms about some new legislation which won't differentiate between those who are coerced/trafficked into it, and those who are doing it willingly. It made for an interesting read.Comment
-
all up for banning suits!Originally posted by WTFH View PostWhy do gammonflakes get so up-tight about burqas?
unfortunately the original suit warrior hasn't been watching
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...uicide-bombing
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...llege-pakistan
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...r-restrictionsComment
-
Two thoughts:
1) The increased uptake of the full face veil is symptomatic of the spread of Wahhabism in the UK, a fundamentalist version of Islam akin to a fascist ideology, funded by Saudi.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahhabism#Appearance
2) Religion is not, nor should be protected from ridicule or satire, hate yes. If someone dresses in a stupid way and believes stupid things then in a free society it ok to say so even if the target finds it offensive. No one has the right not to be offended. Too many people are conflating offence with hate.But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the youngerComment
-
Just want to check, around the whole world, you found 3 instances since 2013, and that's enough to make it a very common thing that must be stopped at all costs?Originally posted by vetran View Postall up for banning suits!
unfortunately the original suit warrior hasn't been watching
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...uicide-bombing
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...llege-pakistan
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...r-restrictions
Or is that not what you're saying?…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment