Originally posted by smalldog
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
MP Meeting
I met with my MP this morning. He was very good, and was supportive.
I was concious that there were other constituents waiting so kept it short. He had read the docs that I had emailed to him beforehand.
We discussed what was the 'Will of Parliament' in 1987 regarding Padmore. He understood; after all our grievance is about injustice & malfeasance, not tax avoidance.
I have spoken to NTRT this morning & given a more in depth feedback.
My MP will be writing again to the Treasury.
I urge all others to get down to their MP's surgeries asap. It's not that daunting. Go for it!Ninja
'Salad is a dish best served cold'Comment
-
Originally posted by Ninja View PostI met with my MP this morning. He was very good, and was supportive.
I was concious that there were other constituents waiting so kept it short. He had read the docs that I had emailed to him beforehand.
We discussed what was the 'Will of Parliament' in 1987 regarding Padmore. He understood; after all our grievance is about injustice & malfeasance, not tax avoidance.
I have spoken to NTRT this morning & given a more in depth feedback.
My MP will be writing again to the Treasury.
I urge all others to get down to their MP's surgeries asap. It's not that daunting. Go for it!Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
"Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECDComment
-
Originally posted by Ninja View PostI met with my MP this morning. He was very good, and was supportive.
I was concious that there were other constituents waiting so kept it short. He had read the docs that I had emailed to him beforehand.
We discussed what was the 'Will of Parliament' in 1987 regarding Padmore. He understood; after all our grievance is about injustice & malfeasance, not tax avoidance.
I have spoken to NTRT this morning & given a more in depth feedback.
My MP will be writing again to the Treasury.
I urge all others to get down to their MP's surgeries asap. It's not that daunting. Go for it!Comment
-
Originally posted by Dazed and Confused View PostHi Ninja - Can you say which documents you sent him beforehand?
Good luck!Ninja
'Salad is a dish best served cold'Comment
-
Letter from MP
Just got a letter from my MP, along with a 6 page letter from Gauke concluding that 'those seeking to avoid tax through aggressive schemes such as this must accept the risk that the scheme they have chosen does not work, and be prepared for the consequences'.
Gauke's letter also states that 'Representatives of this lobby group have made a number of misleading assertions in briefings sent to their members for use in writing to their MP'.
This is in response to a letter my MP sent him the day after the January briefing.
Anyone got something similar?
In the process of setting up a meeting with my MP anyway, so quite timely really.Comment
-
Originally posted by Taffia View PostJust got a letter from my MP, along with a 6 page letter from Gauke concluding that 'those seeking to avoid tax through aggressive schemes such as this must accept the risk that the scheme they have chosen does not work, and be prepared for the consequences'.
Gauke's letter also states that 'Representatives of this lobby group have made a number of misleading assertions in briefings sent to their members for use in writing to their MP'.
This is in response to a letter my MP sent him the day after the January briefing.
Anyone got something similar?
In the process of setting up a meeting with my MP anyway, so quite timely really.
Keep up the good fight!Ninja
'Salad is a dish best served cold'Comment
-
Originally posted by Taffia View PostJust got a letter from my MP, along with a 6 page letter from Gauke concluding that 'those seeking to avoid tax through aggressive schemes such as this must accept the risk that the scheme they have chosen does not work, and be prepared for the consequences'.
Gauke's letter also states that 'Representatives of this lobby group have made a number of misleading assertions in briefings sent to their members for use in writing to their MP'.
This is in response to a letter my MP sent him the day after the January briefing.
Anyone got something similar?
In the process of setting up a meeting with my MP anyway, so quite timely really.Comment
-
Originally posted by Taffia View PostJust got a letter from my MP, along with a 6 page letter from Gauke concluding that 'those seeking to avoid tax through aggressive schemes such as this must accept the risk that the scheme they have chosen does not work, and be prepared for the consequences'.
Gauke's letter also states that 'Representatives of this lobby group have made a number of misleading assertions in briefings sent to their members for use in writing to their MP'.
This is in response to a letter my MP sent him the day after the January briefing.
Anyone got something similar?
In the process of setting up a meeting with my MP anyway, so quite timely really.
If the scheme did NOT work why the hell did it need retrospective law changes ?
I rest my case.Comment
-
Originally posted by GaukeThose seeking to avoid tax through aggressive schemes such as this must accept the risk that the scheme they have chosen does not work, and be prepared for the consequences.
Plonker...Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Comment