Originally posted by smalldog
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
My neighbour's a good friend of his, he has an agenda of his own so don't expect him to put his head above the parapet on this one. -
MP Meeting
I met with my MP this morning. He was very good, and was supportive.
I was concious that there were other constituents waiting so kept it short. He had read the docs that I had emailed to him beforehand.
We discussed what was the 'Will of Parliament' in 1987 regarding Padmore. He understood; after all our grievance is about injustice & malfeasance, not tax avoidance.
I have spoken to NTRT this morning & given a more in depth feedback.
My MP will be writing again to the Treasury.
I urge all others to get down to their MP's surgeries asap. It's not that daunting. Go for it!Ninja
'Salad is a dish best served cold'Comment
-
Well done, and thanks for the feedback!Originally posted by Ninja View PostI met with my MP this morning. He was very good, and was supportive.
I was concious that there were other constituents waiting so kept it short. He had read the docs that I had emailed to him beforehand.
We discussed what was the 'Will of Parliament' in 1987 regarding Padmore. He understood; after all our grievance is about injustice & malfeasance, not tax avoidance.
I have spoken to NTRT this morning & given a more in depth feedback.
My MP will be writing again to the Treasury.
I urge all others to get down to their MP's surgeries asap. It's not that daunting. Go for it!Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
"Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECDComment
-
Hi Ninja - Can you say which documents you sent him beforehand?Originally posted by Ninja View PostI met with my MP this morning. He was very good, and was supportive.
I was concious that there were other constituents waiting so kept it short. He had read the docs that I had emailed to him beforehand.
We discussed what was the 'Will of Parliament' in 1987 regarding Padmore. He understood; after all our grievance is about injustice & malfeasance, not tax avoidance.
I have spoken to NTRT this morning & given a more in depth feedback.
My MP will be writing again to the Treasury.
I urge all others to get down to their MP's surgeries asap. It's not that daunting. Go for it!Comment
-
The latest newsletter from NTRT. I know my MP socially so have a close informal relationship.Originally posted by Dazed and Confused View PostHi Ninja - Can you say which documents you sent him beforehand?
Good luck!Ninja
'Salad is a dish best served cold'Comment
-
Letter from MP
Just got a letter from my MP, along with a 6 page letter from Gauke concluding that 'those seeking to avoid tax through aggressive schemes such as this must accept the risk that the scheme they have chosen does not work, and be prepared for the consequences'.
Gauke's letter also states that 'Representatives of this lobby group have made a number of misleading assertions in briefings sent to their members for use in writing to their MP'.
This is in response to a letter my MP sent him the day after the January briefing.
Anyone got something similar?
In the process of setting up a meeting with my MP anyway, so quite timely really.Comment
-
So what you're saying is that he's rattled. It shows that our campaign is working.Originally posted by Taffia View PostJust got a letter from my MP, along with a 6 page letter from Gauke concluding that 'those seeking to avoid tax through aggressive schemes such as this must accept the risk that the scheme they have chosen does not work, and be prepared for the consequences'.
Gauke's letter also states that 'Representatives of this lobby group have made a number of misleading assertions in briefings sent to their members for use in writing to their MP'.
This is in response to a letter my MP sent him the day after the January briefing.
Anyone got something similar?
In the process of setting up a meeting with my MP anyway, so quite timely really.
Keep up the good fight!Ninja
'Salad is a dish best served cold'Comment
-
Lol, this from the man who uses the word 'clarification' to cover up blatant lies? Oh dear. I take it he wasn't prepared in his letter to state exactly what had been misrepresented? Better leave that vague, just in case, eh Gauke? The chickens coming home to roost, methinks.Originally posted by Taffia View PostJust got a letter from my MP, along with a 6 page letter from Gauke concluding that 'those seeking to avoid tax through aggressive schemes such as this must accept the risk that the scheme they have chosen does not work, and be prepared for the consequences'.
Gauke's letter also states that 'Representatives of this lobby group have made a number of misleading assertions in briefings sent to their members for use in writing to their MP'.
This is in response to a letter my MP sent him the day after the January briefing.
Anyone got something similar?
In the process of setting up a meeting with my MP anyway, so quite timely really.Comment
-
The guy really is a class act!Originally posted by Taffia View PostJust got a letter from my MP, along with a 6 page letter from Gauke concluding that 'those seeking to avoid tax through aggressive schemes such as this must accept the risk that the scheme they have chosen does not work, and be prepared for the consequences'.
Gauke's letter also states that 'Representatives of this lobby group have made a number of misleading assertions in briefings sent to their members for use in writing to their MP'.
This is in response to a letter my MP sent him the day after the January briefing.
Anyone got something similar?
In the process of setting up a meeting with my MP anyway, so quite timely really.
If the scheme did NOT work why the hell did it need retrospective law changes ?
I rest my case.Comment
-
Err... isn't that the argument you are making... that you are more than happy to suffer any consequences of the scheme not working at the time when you sought to avoid tax. (i.e. without retrospection)Originally posted by GaukeThose seeking to avoid tax through aggressive schemes such as this must accept the risk that the scheme they have chosen does not work, and be prepared for the consequences.
Plonker...Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment