Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Fraud vs. Fraud
Nice to see TaxShouldntBeTaxing back on the mount. Stirring stuff.
New argument - HMRC have committed fraud.Last edited by the great escape; 24 April 2015, 20:58.Comment
-
Originally posted by the great escape View PostNice to see TaxShouldntBeTaxing back on the mount. Stirring stuff.
New argument - HMRC have committed fraud.
welcome back TSBTComment
-
The way forward
Assuming, as I fully expect, we get a robust response from Anne Redston on the fraud angle, hopefully this week, then we need to start pushing ahead. Delay only serves HMRC.
We have been given 2 options for bringing TAA into the frame.
1. Everyone requests a review
http://www.mckieandco.com/Reviews_-_..._or_Shield.pdf
2. Everyone applies to the FTT
We are still chewing this over with our advisors but if anyone has any views please feel free to chip in.Last edited by DonkeyRhubarb; 26 April 2015, 12:00.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostAssuming, as I fully expect, we get a robust response from Anne Redston on the fraud angle, hopefully this week, then we need to start pushing ahead. Delay only serves HMRC.
We have been given 2 options for bringing TAA into the frame.
1. Everyone requests a review
http://www.mckieandco.com/Reviews_-_..._or_Shield.pdf
2. Everyone applies to the FTT
We are still chewing this over with our advisors but if anyone has any views please feel free to chip in.
From a only a quick read of the article on HMRCs review process, flawed conduct seems to be a worrying theme. Further to DRs call for "pushing ahead", it does not seem likely that a review will serve that purpose.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostAssuming, as I fully expect, we get a robust response from Anne Redston on the fraud angle, hopefully this week, then we need to start pushing ahead. Delay only serves HMRC.
We have been given 2 options for bringing TAA into the frame.
1. Everyone requests a review
http://www.mckieandco.com/Reviews_-_..._or_Shield.pdf
2. Everyone applies to the FTT
We are still chewing this over with our advisors but if anyone has any views please feel free to chip in.Comment
-
Fig leaf or Shield?
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostAssuming, as I fully expect, we get a robust response from Anne Redston on the fraud angle, hopefully this week, then we need to start pushing ahead. Delay only serves HMRC.
We have been given 2 options for bringing TAA into the frame.
1. Everyone requests a review
http://www.mckieandco.com/Reviews_-_..._or_Shield.pdf
2. Everyone applies to the FTT
We are still chewing this over with our advisors but if anyone has any views please feel free to chip in.
The HMRC Ombudsman, established as an independent authority, is party to the cover up of malfeasance, and even the judiciary have been seen to adopt a partisan position upholding the establishment's interpretation of the law.
The conclusion to the document you link to states:
'Conclusion
The right of a taxpayer to require HMRC to review a Decision, construed purposively, is an important one which gives substantial protection to the taxpayer and imposes onerous duties on HMRC. It is clear
that HMRC do not give proper weight
to those duties and that their practice
fails to comply with them in a number of important respects. An appellant taxpayer should be prepared to insist that the procedure is followed properly and be prepared to enforce it with judicial review proceedings, in appropriate circumstances, if necessary.'
That doesn't bode well either. We are likely to get the same old bull tulip and provide Hector with more time to come up with fresh interpretations or even rewrite the law.
My take is to now take the fight to them. Go to the FTT and make this entire stitch up public.
Comment
-
Not being a member and so not involved. From my reading of the above the last chance anyone will have of avoiding those very large bills from hmrc is joining ntrtg asap before the drawbridge is closedmerely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostAssuming, as I fully expect, we get a robust response from Anne Redston on the fraud angle, hopefully this week, then we need to start pushing ahead. Delay only serves HMRC.
We have been given 2 options for bringing TAA into the frame.
1. Everyone requests a review
http://www.mckieandco.com/Reviews_-_..._or_Shield.pdf
2. Everyone applies to the FTT
We are still chewing this over with our advisors but if anyone has any views please feel free to chip in.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostAssuming, as I fully expect, we get a robust response from Anne Redston on the fraud angle, hopefully this week, then we need to start pushing ahead. Delay only serves HMRC.
We have been given 2 options for bringing TAA into the frame.
1. Everyone requests a review
http://www.mckieandco.com/Reviews_-_..._or_Shield.pdf
2. Everyone applies to the FTT
We are still chewing this over with our advisors but if anyone has any views please feel free to chip in.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment