I would be inclined to do review first, any lack of due process as part of the review can be used as evidence in any subsequent tribunal as an example le of further failing.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by the great escape View PostThanks DR. do we only get one shot at it i.e. 1 or 2 OR is there the luxury of 1 then 2 if 1 fails?Comment
-
If 2 is always an option, I'd be inclined to ask for a review using an elegently worded toolkit from CCW, as per last newsletter.Last edited by the great escape; 26 April 2015, 21:06.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostAssuming, as I fully expect, we get a robust response from Anne Redston on the fraud angle, hopefully this week, then we need to start pushing ahead. Delay only serves HMRC.
We have been given 2 options for bringing TAA into the frame.
1. Everyone requests a review
http://www.mckieandco.com/Reviews_-_..._or_Shield.pdf
2. Everyone applies to the FTT
We are still chewing this over with our advisors but if anyone has any views please feel free to chip in.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post2 is always an option, no matter what the outcome of 1.
An appellant taxpayer should be prepared to insist that the procedure is followed properly..... We can insist as much as we like but this does not mean that Hector will comply or even entertain the insistance
Perhaps the way ahead would be we fire both options at once or fire one a week after the other...? Forutne favours the bold.... DR's option 2 seems to be the option with the least amount of dicking around ...Let the financial healing commenceComment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostThey clearly came to the meeting armed with the fraud angle. It's all they wanted to talk about. It turned out to be a short meeting.
Given that some people are in receipt of APNs, I think time is of the essence.
I don't believe for one minute that a review will lead to HMRC dropping their tax demands or entering into negotation, and I think our only hope of resolution lies in the courts (or on the steps of the courtroom).
I vote that we press ahead with the FTT as quickly as possible.Comment
-
agreed!!
Originally posted by Morlock View PostI vote that we press ahead with the FTT as quickly as possible.
Agree - we're probably near to the end game - think it's time this phase is brought to a conclusion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by funjim View PostAgree - we're probably near to the end game - think it's time this phase is brought to a conclusion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by screwthis View Post+1Comment
-
Originally posted by Morlock View PostClearly they had no intention of negotiating a settlement.
Given that some people are in receipt of APNs, I think time is of the essence.
I don't believe for one minute that a review will lead to HMRC dropping their tax demands or entering into negotation, and I think our only hope of resolution lies in the courts (or on the steps of the courtroom).
I vote that we press ahead with the FTT as quickly as possible.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment