Reply to: Tread very carefully HMRC

[northernladuk]

I expect the OP is still in the pub celebrating HMRC throwing in the towel on Actinium and sending closure notices with no further changes to return or tax due,

Too much beer would explain his latest FOI I guess.

[handyandy]

Did this thread get deleted? Can you include his other one as well?

I expect the OP is still in the pub celebrating HMRC throwing in the towel on Actinium and sending closure notices with no further changes to return or tax due,

[northernladuk]

Right you are.

I’ll give it a couple of hours so that people can see my reply then I’ll delete this thread.

I’ll also ask Admin to give you PM rights.

Did this thread get deleted? Can you include his other one as well?

[cojak]

Right you are.

I’ll give it a couple of hours so that people can see my reply then I’ll delete this thread.

I’ll also ask Admin to give you PM rights.

[eek]

Sorry about this. I lost it a bit getting the letter from HMRC, and especially the gall of them using Covid as an excuse for the radio silence when it's 15 years since I last heard anything from them.

I've removed the original post.

Fully understandable.

You need advice to see if HMRC did things correctly 15 years ago - that will require a subject matter request for everything HMRC have on you and it may be worth reading a different thread from https://forums.contractoruk.com/hmrc...ml#post2934231 onwards and possibly PMing DealorNoDeal.

[webby653]

Sorry about this. I lost it a bit getting the letter from HMRC, and especially the gall of them using Covid as an excuse for the radio silence when it's 15 years since I last heard anything from them.

I've removed the original post.

[northernladuk]

Agreed. And completely pointless. I guess the OP might feel a bit better for a few seconds after

Yeah but when the red mist has settled and he looks at it again it's going to be toe curling for him. No delete button either.

[Fred Bloggs]

It appears to be a rant of some sort.

Agreed. And completely pointless. I guess the OP might feel a bit better for a few seconds after

[DealorNoDeal]

It appears to be a rant of some sort.

I think many here can relate to that where HMRC are concerned.

[SueEllen]

That would make more sense. But the request posted doesn't actually contain a question. As far as I can see?

It appears to be a rant of some sort.

[Fred Bloggs]

Wrong type of request.

Think webby653 you meant to make a data subject access request.

That would make more sense. But the request posted doesn't actually contain a question. As far as I can see?

[SueEllen]

Wrong type of request.

Think webby653 you meant to make a data subject access request.

[DealorNoDeal]

Perhaps he's in a state of shock. I could imagine some people losing it getting a brown envelope out of the blue after 15 years of nothing.

Unfortunately, he's in for another shock when he finds out how much late payment interest will have accrued since 2005.

[northernladuk]

What an odd thing to do. And then publicise the fact including the loss of any anonymity here. Oh well, takes all sorts, I suppose.

Odd is an understatment. What a waste of everyone's time that is for absolutely nothing. Talk about embarrasing yourself on a forum of your peers.

[eek]

So it seems this is another person connected to the letters mentioned at https://forums.contractoruk.com/hmrc...ml#post2934231

Which opens the actual question - what did HMRC say in the original letter back in 2005/7 and if you look in your personal tax record are the years open or marked as closed