• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: 86 47

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "86 47"

Collapse

  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    One more generation and we will all be Peppa Pigs...
    Speaking of which, I hear Bunter, the Fat Owl of the Remove, has spawned again.

    Anyone know what the current count is?

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by hobnob View Post

    Personally, I agree with your sentiment: I'd much prefer it if people didn't say "unalive" or "grape". However, I think the reasons are a bit more nuanced. For instance, there are lots of people on this forum who use the word "tulip". Is that because they're all snowflakes who would clutch their pearls and faint if they used a real swear word? Or is it because they don't want the forum software to block their post and/or ban their account?

    Similarly, if you know that social media algorithms (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube) would hide your videos/comments for using certain words, are you being a snowflake if you use substitutes? After a while, that can become a habit, and some people will copy what they see other people doing.
    Possibly, but you can reverse that argument. Such substitutions wouldn't be necessary if people were grown up enough and well educated enough to accept the language as it is written and not retreat from harsh reality. We seem to have a generation who fail those criteria quite badly.

    One more generation and we will all be Peppa Pigs...

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    Tulip appears because the forum "software" bowdlerises the original word. Never did figure out what daffodil was.
    whereas sh1t just happens

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Tulip appears because the forum "software" bowdlerises the original word. Never did figure out what daffodil was.

    Leave a comment:


  • hobnob
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    Various snowflakes have adopted it since it is a lot nicer than saying "Kill", apparently. (Same logic as others are using the hideous "unalive", both as adjective and verb. )
    Personally, I agree with your sentiment: I'd much prefer it if people didn't say "unalive" or "grape". However, I think the reasons are a bit more nuanced. For instance, there are lots of people on this forum who use the word "tulip". Is that because they're all snowflakes who would clutch their pearls and faint if they used a real swear word? Or is it because they don't want the forum software to block their post and/or ban their account?

    Similarly, if you know that social media algorithms (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube) would hide your videos/comments for using certain words, are you being a snowflake if you use substitutes? After a while, that can become a habit, and some people will copy what they see other people doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    "But the point is that in the radio series of Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, Ford and Arthur pull letters from a scrabble bag and get the result "What do you get if you multiply six by nine?"."

    I always thought there was something fundamentally wrong with the universe.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    ok

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post
    52 in octal
    2a in hex
    But the point is that in the radio series of Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, Ford and Arthur pull letters from a scrabble bag and get the result "What do you get if you multiply six by nine?".

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Yeh I'm shouting *** all the time.
    Im more a #&|¬ man, myself

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Yeh I'm shouting *** all the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    And 101010 in binary, which is rather more elegant...
    * - which I think is even more elegant...

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    And 101010 in binary, which is rather more elegant...

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    52 in octal
    2a in hex

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    Not sensitive at all. But changing a subtly humorous post to a generalised non-very-humorous line did seem just a little silly, since the original had already made the point quite clearly (IMVHO of course...).

    Did you understand the line about 42 not being equal to 45-47 I wonder...
    I do know that 6x9=42 in base 13.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X