Originally posted by woody1
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: One for NLUK
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "One for NLUK"
Collapse
-
second/third generation sluffies of many ethnicities tend to have a slough accent its pretty hard to resist.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostTough read that. So she's still not won, she's won the right for some aspects to be re-heard which will be interested. Reading all that and now it's been proven in law that accents are racially connected I can't see how the University can win. There is a long paragraph in the middle where the judge talks about making a racial comment unknowingly still breaks the law. That's gonna be complex although I think there is more going on here and it doesn't say which bits EAT will hear.
I kind of get some off it, around making a racially insensitive comment by mistake can technically still constitute racial harassment. The label can be associated, yes, it's the reaction and outcome that worries me. It's a bit like taking a pad of post it notes that were on your desk home is technically theft. There isn't a criminal/HR investigation every time this happens. If someone does comment on a strong accent it could, technically, fall under racial harassment but doesn't meet the spirit of the rule to protect people from being treated badly so it could be dismissed if a complaint is put forward. I have a horrible feeling that because it's got the word race in it every occurrence could be pushed through to EAT and the companies can never win.
Funny old world.
Leave a comment:
-
Sorry, can you speak English, please? I can't understand you.Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
I find your statement very hurtful and feel that you have no consideration for the impact your post may have on my mental wellbeing.
As such I wish to make a formal complaint.
Leave a comment:
-
Tough read that. So she's still not won, she's won the right for some aspects to be re-heard which will be interested. Reading all that and now it's been proven in law that accents are racially connected I can't see how the University can win. There is a long paragraph in the middle where the judge talks about making a racial comment unknowingly still breaks the law. That's gonna be complex although I think there is more going on here and it doesn't say which bits EAT will hear.
I kind of get some off it, around making a racially insensitive comment by mistake can technically still constitute racial harassment. The label can be associated, yes, it's the reaction and outcome that worries me. It's a bit like taking a pad of post it notes that were on your desk home is technically theft. There isn't a criminal/HR investigation every time this happens. If someone does comment on a strong accent it could, technically, fall under racial harassment but doesn't meet the spirit of the rule to protect people from being treated badly so it could be dismissed if a complaint is put forward. I have a horrible feeling that because it's got the word race in it every occurrence could be pushed through to EAT and the companies can never win.
Funny old world.
Leave a comment:
-
I find your statement very hurtful and feel that you have no consideration for the impact your post may have on my mental wellbeing.Originally posted by WTFH View Post
This from the man having a meltdown over an advert for a car.
As such I wish to make a formal complaint.
Leave a comment:
-
Is that a "Non crime, racial harassment" charge? Instigated by the department of hurty feelings?
Leave a comment:
-
One for NLUK
One for NLUK
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...arassment.html
Telling someone you can't understand them due to their accent could be racial harassment, judge says after marketing manager with Brazilian twang took university to tribunal
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is your Director’s Loan Account (DLS) a target of HMRC’s closer look at close companies? Yesterday 04:45
- Contractors, are you making any of the five big limited company bank account mistakes of 2026? May 28 05:51
- ‘Welcome’ increase in HMRC mileage rates for contractors using their own cars for work May 27 05:18
- King’s Speech 2026 including a welcome Late Payments Bill still leaves contractors short May 26 04:42
- Getting a mortgage when you're a contractor. The system wasn't built for you. Is that finally changing? May 22 06:11
- How deepfake AI contractors threaten umbrella company supply chains under JSL May 20 06:31
- Mileage rates review: Will the first AMAP rethink in 15 years benefit contractors? May 19 05:57
- What is a Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE), and are FDE jobs for IT contractors ripe? May 18 04:43
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25


Leave a comment: