• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "801 Migrants cross English Channel in 1 day"

Collapse

  • Snooky
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    Snooks is posing a crass argument anyway
    Do you mean me, or is there someone called Snooks? If you mean me, remind me which of my posts you're referring to?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied


    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post

    Congratulations! or did your nana switch it off for you?
    signing your own posts now?

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post



    Sorry is it a bit complicated you think I am addressing you? I'm not that desperate for conversation.
    Congratulations! or did your nana switch it off for you?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied


    Originally posted by saddo the low IQ guy View Post

    you're asking who? - mal adjusted or WTF?

    (poor sad little man can't switch multiquote off)
    Sorry is it a bit complicated you think I am addressing you? I'm not that desperate for conversation.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post

    I was NOT addressing you. wind your red neck in.
    "you're asking who? - mal adjusted or WTF?"

    QED

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    Hi! Mr Kettle, meet Mr Pot....


    Come the day you actually answer one of my posts, I might take some notice of you.
    I was NOT addressing you. wind your red neck in.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post

    you're asking who? - mal adjusted or WTF?

    (poor sad little man can't switch multiquote off)
    Hi! Mr Kettle, meet Mr Pot....


    Come the day you actually answer one of my posts, I might take some notice of you.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post



    Problem is if the dim Guardian readers / Labour thickos don't know how to make the sums add up then the net contributors leave or cut down their effort. Cheap (imported or not labour) won't cut it tax wise.

    The brain drain has started.

    So as no longer a contributor have you relinquished your state pension, reliance on the NHS etc. or are you still expecting those?



    you're asking who? - mal adjusted or WTF?

    (poor sad little man can't switch multiquote off)

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post

    You're Goddamn Right! Particularly the Norman bastards.

    Then again the Beaker Folk weren't too keen on the Celts.
    That was an invasion, should we treat the "Illegal" migrant deluge as an "Invasion"?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    Opinions may differ on that interpretation. Not all generalisations are valid, only some are.
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    That's exactly how society should work.
    Problem is if the dim Guardian readers / Labour thickos don't know how to make the sums add up then the net contributors leave or cut down their effort. Cheap (imported or not labour) won't cut it tax wise.

    The brain drain has started.

    So as no longer a contributor have you relinquished your state pension, reliance on the NHS etc. or are you still expecting those?




    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    Opinions may differ on that interpretation. Not all generalisations are valid, only some are.
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    Welcome to "Tell me you are racist without saying you are". Snooks is posing a crass argument anyway; how would you classify an Australian, for example?
    Bonzer mate?

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    Attempting to get my head around "pure bred" and "English". .
    Welcome to "Tell me you are racist without saying you are". Snooks is posing a crass argument anyway; how would you classify an Australian, for example?

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Attempting to get my head around "pure bred" and "English". .

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Snooky View Post

    That's kind of how our society works though, right? Those in a better place contributing to help out those in a worse position: progressive tax system, welfare safety net, NHS etc etc. Some people will always be a net drain to the country, even those of working age fulfilling necessary roles. Any of us could easily end up being a net burden to society at some point in the future.
    That's exactly how society should work.
    But if you're a far right propaganda machine, you rule out the facts that many people are taking out more than they put in, and just choose a small percentage, so that all people who are grouped together under a tag can then be demonised.
    GBeebies wouldn't surprise any of us if they suggested that people who weren't pure-bred English should be forced to wear a sign marking them out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Snooky
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    I suspect that anyone earning less than a certain wage, no matter where they were born, no matter what skin colour, what religion, what nationality, what gender, if they earn below a certain level then they could be seen as "taking out more than they are putting in".
    That's kind of how our society works though, right? Those in a better place contributing to help out those in a worse position: progressive tax system, welfare safety net, NHS etc etc. Some people will always be a net drain to the country, even those of working age fulfilling necessary roles. Any of us could easily end up being a net burden to society at some point in the future.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X