• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "And they are going to publish it..."

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    was quite surprised when I read the book and found out about Laputa and the Houyhnhnms
    You may have a point. Will have to read it again if I can be *rsed. That's the problem with online comments generally, we all wade in with our opinions despite only having read a few headlines.

    Leave a comment:


  • hobnob
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    It's nothing new. I was taught Gulliver's Travels in primary school and thoroughly enjoyed it.. Many years later I re-read the original version; there were quite a lot of "updates" that somehow got omitted from the first one!
    Gulliver's Travels is an interesting one. Most of the adaptations only focus on the first 2 locations (Lilliput and Brobdingnag), so I was quite surprised when I read the book and found out about Laputa and the Houyhnhnms. I was also surprised that the "footnotes" (in an appendix) were longer than the actual novel! There were loads of political references that had gone completely over my head when I took the story at face value.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Or even create filthified versions of innocent books. Every book to be published in three editions; Puffin for the kiddies, Penguin for the adults and Bonobo for the dirty old men/women.
    Last one sounds like my sort of thing. Although Adele Penguins are pervy gits too.

    https://nypost.com/2018/04/14/pengui...erted-animals/

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    No such thing as bad advertising.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Uncle Albert View Post

    Or even create filthified versions of innocent books. Every book to be published in three editions; Puffin for the kiddies, Penguin for the adults and Bonobo for the dirty old men/women.
    Fifty shades of Violet?

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    It's nothing new. I was taught Gulliver's Travels in primary school and thoroughly enjoyed it.. Many years later I re-read the original version; there were quite a lot of "updates" that somehow got omitted from the first one! The difference now is that the primary school people are now twenty-year olds and a bunch of forty year old self-proclaimed mentors seem to think they need the same protection from harsh reality.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle Albert
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Maybe they could have cleansed versions of all books for wokes and have soiled versions, with only offensive stuff, for the rest of us.
    Or even create filthified versions of innocent books. Every book to be published in three editions; Puffin for the kiddies, Penguin for the adults and Bonobo for the dirty old men/women.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Maybe they could have cleansed versions of all books for wokes and have soiled versions, with only offensive stuff, for the rest of us.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    started a topic And they are going to publish it...

    And they are going to publish it...

    Panic over.

    Sorry.

    Penguin are going to republish Roald Dahl's full works later this year.

    Puffin are going to have the cleansed version for children.


    linky - https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-e...-b2288880.html


    Oh and it is nothing to do with the Queen Consort.
    Last edited by SueEllen; 24 February 2023, 12:59. Reason: To add a link

Working...
X