Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
No - everybody should pay tax, including pensioners
Stop there. If you get a state pension, that amount is taken off your personal allowance, so it is fully taxed at source. If you ave a provate income, that is also taxable at source.
It was a mistake to increase tax free thresholds to the point that very large quantity of people don’t pay income tax
No it wasn't. It saves a lot of money and bureaucracy.
Frankly no tax should equal to no vote and ideally votes should be directly proportional to the amount of direct taxes paid
Now I know you're only having a laugh. That's just so ridiculous
Another thing to consider is our aging population. Demographics of the UK are not quite so bad as say China or Germany (or Russia), but overall developed countries are aging and the younger population is shrinking.
We have now reached a situation where more than half of the boomers are retired. At retirement they instantly go from high earning mature workers putting away capital for retirement, to zero earnings and drawing down that capital. This means that sources of capital are drying up, so interest rates will go up no matter what any government does.
We also do not have a large young population that could drive consumer led growth (as does say Mexico or India). The Truss/Kwarteng idea of cutting tax to restimulate the country into a new growth phase was nothing but pure fantasy - it might have been a viable strategy in around 2008.
The country that led the way in aging and shows us what its effects will look like is Japan (top of the table), as its baby boom started before WW2, so it experience the drop-off first.
So I think its inevitable that we are headed for a long period of stagflation. I think the best any government can realistically do is to continue to fight the small battles against that, there is no easy solution. Ever since Bretton Woods our currency has been on a long slow path of decline and cutting interest rates to nearly 0% in 2008 was the last free ride it could ever give us.
I am honestly excited about Labour plans to invest in the green energy revolution in this country, since we have a lot of potential with both wind and micro-nuclear. Carbon neutral by 2030 they say. Except its Labour and it will probably be a badly managed mess. But even if its 2040, 2050, it seems like one of the few areas where we could invest and make progress.
So that is how we got here. We couldn't accept it was game-over in 2008 and kept looking for another free ride fantasy instead of facing up to reality. Brexit was a big fantasy. Covid is not to blame it merely accelerated the innevitable.
The country I think will be most badly affected in Europe is Germany. Reliant on Russia for energy, entirely export driven economy exposing them to supply chain risk that is going throught the roof, and fastest aging population in Europe. Still seems to be better managed than the UK though!
Last edited by willendure; 20 October 2022, 11:56.
National debt in 2007 was around 500 billion.
Currently it is about 2500 billion.
Debt interest payments will soon be £100 billion per year.
In 2021, the government revenue in the United Kingdom amounted to around 855 billion pounds, while government spending came to around 1,040 billion pounds
So it seems there is currently a £200 billion deficit which gets added to the national debt each year.
Looking at the history, the deficit was coming back under control before covid, but then exploded in 2020 and 2021.
It's going to have to end in one of two ways, massive QE again to pay the deficit each year, resulting in a £ worth about 10¢ and hyper-inflation.
Or UK does an Icelandic style default and says "sorry we are broke and aren't paying any of our debt obligations"
No - everybody should pay tax, including pensioners
It was a mistake to increase tax free thresholds to the point that very large quantity of people don’t pay income tax
Frankly no tax should equal to no vote and ideally votes should be directly proportional to the amount of direct taxes paid
The cost of collecting the tax exceeds the tax take at the bottom end, also if they raise the min wage at the same time in work benefits should disappear.
Shove the tax bands up a bit as well to make sure that the lowest paid are out of income tax.
Scrap NI and put it into the 25p and 40p bands (dunno what that would make it but 30p and 50p would seem reasonable).
But don't increase VAT as that will directly push inflation up.... The gov could get inflation down to any figure to wanted to with a VAT cut but why would they do that????
No - everybody should pay tax, including pensioners
It was a mistake to increase tax free thresholds to the point that very large quantity of people don’t pay income tax
Frankly no tax should equal to no vote and ideally votes should be directly proportional to the amount of direct taxes paid
Is it just me, or does it feel like it could be worse than post-2008?
UK is in deep tulipe.
National debt in 2007 was around 500 billion.
Currently it is about 2500 billion.
Debt interest payments will soon be £100 billion per year.
In 2021, the government revenue in the United Kingdom amounted to around 855 billion pounds, while government spending came to around 1,040 billion pounds
So it seems there is currently a £200 billion deficit which gets added to the national debt each year.
Looking at the history, the deficit was coming back under control before covid, but then exploded in 2020 and 2021.
so many of the "poorer" sector have multiple jobs just trying to make ends meet, they still pay NI on at least on of those jobs and if they are really unlucky they are taxed as if they have more than one income.
No, i dont think it works like that.
Employee NI threshold applies to each job. So a nice little loop hole for the low paid.
From next year someone in theory will be able to earn £726 per week, across 3 part time jobs (£242 each) and pay £0 employee NICs for each job.
Covid cost a fortune because the clowns at No10 got it completely wrong and let it kill almost anyone it caught
Not sure which data you're basing that on. Mortality was something like 3% in an unvaccinated population like ours and the first lockdown (the only real one) demonstrably kicked the can down the road so many people never got Covid until vaccinated, as well as smearing the cases out over a longer timeframe pre-vaccine so that people needing ventilation got it (if you got to that point this made a massive difference to survival odds)
Kind of looks like that hole was always there, but the gov was directing atention elsewhere.
Covid cost a fortune because the clowns at No10 got it completely wrong and let it kill almost anyone it caught, at some point they will find a way to prove it was the NHS that got it wrong not the government.
But it was they that gave billions away to "Companies" that sprang up out of nowhere just to claim the Covid grants, and never chased it. Why didn't they chase it god only knows, they know who stole it, why aren't they in other? Money down the drain.
As for taxing the poor, well to actually pay tax you have to be earning money in the first place, so many of the "poorer" sector have multiple jobs just trying to make ends meet, they still pay NI on at least on of those jobs and if they are really unlucky they are taxed as if they have more than one income. If they are below the tax threshold they really are not very well off at all.
If they are working through an umbrella they get to pay both parts of the NI, which isn't a small sum. Then they have to worry about how to put fuel in the car to get to work, or expensive bus fares, or if they are lucky they can find work that's within cycling distance.
I think we will see a return very soon to the days when people rode little 100mpg motorcycles to get to work. At least there's a chance you can afford to fuel it?
Now what about the plans to tax all these pure electric cars that are paying no road tax and very little per mile in power? Road pricing? Pay a fixed rate per mile gleaned from little black boxes measuring your journey? It will come because the Gov cannot afford to lose all that road fund and fuel duty... Is it £30 billions worth? I wouldn't know.
Then there's VAT. They could cut the cost of everything to the population just by lowering the VAT rate. It would lower the cost of fuel, food, consumables, gas, electricity, medicine, care, housing, just about anything that has a VAT component would become cheaper. Even the VAT registered amongst us would be slightly better off. The accountants bills would be slightly cheaper too....
Why won't they do that? Well.... It's money for old rope for a start. A tax on a tax in effect. A golden goose.
Main income tax band needs to go up by 5% at least - should raise 70-80 bln, plus VAT to 25% - do it 1% per annum to make it easier, sorted.
Shove the tax bands up a bit as well to make sure that the lowest paid are out of income tax.
Scrap NI and put it into the 25p and 40p bands (dunno what that would make it but 30p and 50p would seem reasonable).
But don't increase VAT as that will directly push inflation up.... The gov could get inflation down to any figure to wanted to with a VAT cut but why would they do that????
Lots of ex-teachers I know do have the qualifications to return to industry and have done so. Well I've worked with a few. Not all of them have quit during training or recently afterwards.
You know lots of people who gave up well-paying professional jobs to re-train as teachers?
What on earth possessed them to do such a thing!? For the last 10 years, every teacher I know has the same advice to those considering a career in teaching: Don't!
Leave a comment: