• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Captain Tom Foundation being investigated"

Collapse

  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    what £500+ a day?
    No. 100+ a day like Fraidy and ConsultingTechArsietect.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post

    I'm suggesting that if you don't pay a good market rate to run a major organisation, you might not get the very best people.
    Where have I heard that before.....

    "Lessons will be learnt"

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    Are you suggesting that some charity CEOs are claiming full time salaries from more than one charity, and by so doing, are not doing a good job of any of them?
    I'm suggesting that if you don't pay a good market rate to run a major organisation, you might not get the very best people.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post

    Probably why charities aren't run very well
    Are you suggesting that some charity CEOs are claiming full time salaries from more than one charity, and by so doing, are not doing a good job of any of them?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by TheDude View Post

    Most charity CEOs limit themselves to around an IT contractors income.
    Probably why charities aren't run very well

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    Inside or outside?
    Ahhh.

    Please don't start that again.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    what £500+ a day?
    Inside or outside?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by TheDude View Post

    Most charity CEOs limit themselves to around an IT contractors income.
    what £500+ a day?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by TheDude View Post

    That is why charities are invariably run by rich public school types without the skills to run a charity properly.
    Many charities have a commercial Ltd Co in the same name run in parallel

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I can certainly see the temptation when you are raising 10s of millions to want a tiny share especially if you were helping out. A real test of your morals when all that cash is flowing past your eyes!
    Most charity CEOs limit themselves to around an IT contractors income.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...r-800-000.html
    How can ordinary people that have been thrust in to the spotlight then go on to have the skills to run a charity properly?
    That is why charities are invariably run by rich public school types without the skills to run a charity properly.

    Leave a comment:


  • tazdevil
    replied
    Only charities I give to are the Sally Army and the Dogs Trust both of which do good

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    I can certainly see the temptation when you are raising 10s of millions to want a tiny share especially if you were helping out. A real test of your morals when all that cash is flowing past your eyes!

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    We actually discussed this months ago, that people were a bit suspicious of the foundation (not as already said, of Tom himself).
    I don't know there's suspicion on the family themselves? Is the implication outside people have homed in on them as potential suckers?
    You'd have to look closely at the situation but that's a potential outcome, or just complete mismanagement and greed by the inexperienced family members thrown in to the job rather than skilled to do it.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    We actually discussed this months ago, that people were a bit suspicious of the foundation (not as already said, of Tom himself).
    I don't know there's suspicion on the family themselves? Is the implication outside people have homed in on them as potential suckers?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X