- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: £350 million a week - let's fund our NHS
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "£350 million a week - let's fund our NHS"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Whorty View Post
When my late wife was in the hospice I got talking to a student nurse who was coming up to the end of her 6 month placement at Salisbury hospital before going back to Winchester Uni. Not only did she not get paid at any time during that 6 months, but she was also still paying her student fees whilst getting next to no Uni support.
How many of us would do a placement degree, and work for free during our placement year .. and yet it seems to be OK to treat nurses like this?
Just so wrong. Nurses and Doctors should not have to pay student fees so long as they work in the NHS for x years after qualifying. This country is so f**ked up sometimes.
Surely after last year people learned about the vital importance of medical staff?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lorakeen View Post
Many countries poorer than the UK regard medical training as strategic and offer a lot of incentives to their youth to pursue such careers. The NHS literally preys on these countries' programs of development by luring away their newly qualified doctors.
As it turns out, brain theft only goes so far.
The lack of staff is probably directly related to the fact many of these countries, especially in Eastern Europe have implemented mandatory working-in-the-country-that-paid-for-your-education periods(up to 10 years for young graduates.
How many of us would do a placement degree, and work for free during our placement year .. and yet it seems to be OK to treat nurses like this?
Just so wrong. Nurses and Doctors should not have to pay student fees so long as they work in the NHS for x years after qualifying. This country is so f**ked up sometimes.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View Post
No, that's down to a lack of training places (too long a reliance on imported labour that mysteriously disappeared when they were asked to prove they could speak passable English), unrealistic educational requirements (other than for doctors, of course) and three month hiring cycles. Add that to high absentee levels, often stretching into months on full pay.
As it turns out, brain theft only goes so far.
The lack of staff is probably directly related to the fact many of these countries, especially in Eastern Europe have implemented mandatory working-in-the-country-that-paid-for-your-education periods(up to 10 years for young graduates.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
Is this why there is a shortage of doctors specifically GPs, nurses, midwives, etc to fill advertised vacancies?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lorakeen View Post
the NHS is prisoner to the trade unions, who are forcing it to keep employing an unholy amount of penpushers and jobsworths.
Leave a comment:
-
It's unlikely that the NHS can make savings by cutting admin costs. Around 14% percent of the budget is spent management and admin. The following is a dated but still relevant analysis.
https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/project...s/nhs-managers
Recent media coverage and parliamentary debate suggests that the NHS is bureaucratic and over managed. The argument goes that much NHS management is unnecessary and that over the past decade the number of NHS managers has increased at a rate disproportionate to need and to the wider growth of the NHS.
Myth. The NHS in England is a £100 billion-a-year-plus business. It sees 1 million patients every 36 hours, spending nearly £2 billion a week. Aside from the banks, the only companies with a larger turnover in the FTSE 100 are the two global oil giants Shell and BP. If the NHS were a country it would be around the thirtieth largest in the world.
If anything, our analysis seems to suggest that the NHS, particularly given the complexity of health care, is under- rather than over-managed.
Last edited by BlasterBates; 4 September 2021, 09:40.
Leave a comment:
-
And they charge companies also, as usual, even over the normal NIC max limit which currently 2% and they want to make it 3.5%, plus on company side no limit for some reason?
I guess after that it would “only be fair” to increase divi rate
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostThe NHS has enough money. Problem is it is being spent on PFI repayments, property taxes, distributed and repetitive procurement by each Trust and supporting an unnecessary army of middle management mostly concerned with largely meaningless performance reporting. Less than half their budget goes on patient care. Put the clinicians back in charge an you might see a difference, but that will never happen.
The public finances are now in such a mess following Covid that a lot of changes will be needed to get things back on track. Sadly, politicians are only interested in their careers so look only at popularity and the next election, and not at anything to do with supporting the country longer term.
Expect more such stories over the next few months. Just don't take them at face value.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cojak View Post...but still expect that £350 million a week, Boris was photographed in front of that bus after all.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Today 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Yesterday 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Leave a comment: