• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

User Profile

Collapse

Profile Sidebar

Collapse
Avatar
shampoo
Should post faster
Last Activity: Yesterday, 12:55
Joined: 1 April 2020
Location:
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
  • Source
Clear All
new posts

  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    Fair point on the distinction, and it's why I listed them separately rather than presenting them as one line of authority.
    • Bates and Sheth are First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) decisions. They're about tax, not whether a debt can be enforced. They're relevant only for what the tribunal found about
    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    The alleged loans were "never meant to be repaid": what the independent sources say

    Lots of us have said for years that these advances/discretionary payments were never meant to be repaid. Here are the independent sources that point the same way, so you can read them yourself....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    Published judgments worth reading — Darwinpay and West 28th Street

    For anyone dealing with Darwin/Darwinpay or West 28th Street, these judgments are publicly available on the National Archives case-law site:
    • Bates v HMRC [2026] UKFTT 1135 (TC), 5 August 2026 (Darwinpay)
      https:
    ...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    Let’s see what arrives in the post today/this week!

    Multiple SAR’s submitted along with an ICO complaint (ICO are a waste of space).

    I wonder if they’re going to test a few files in court this side of Christmas?

    Anyone on here received a full chain of assignment...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    not long to wait ... 5 October 2026...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    They ended up emailing me a partial answer but it didn't actually answer the question I asked. I guess it depends on who you talk to!...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by shampoo; 16 September 2026, 16:00.

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    Whatever the limitation period is, for example six or twelve years, it is important to understand exactly when the time limit started. Under the Limitation Act, time starts to run from the ’cause of action’.

    The ’cause of action’ is the million $ question which is detailed in the alleged...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    I'm not looking for an argument I'm trying to be objective ... You quoted the FCA (I could be wrong the Mrs often tells me I am) ... Up until very recently none of the entities that matter are FCA regulated, therefore, the FCA levers are blunt instruments!

    That may change if/when Ethica...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by shampoo; 16 September 2026, 09:06.

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    Your choice and it may hold true, however, statute barred is generally a shield not a sword. You can get a solicitors view on whether its good but only a judge can actually confirm it ... that requires somebody to issue a claim and go to court.

    My personal experience of the FCA and Citizens...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by shampoo; 16 September 2026, 07:28.

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    None of this has been tested in court so all the posts on this forum are just people’s views! I might be stating the obvious but some people will read proving chain of assignment, statute barred, falsified documentation, can't be regulated etc ... and take it as gospel.

    It's one thing...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    I'm not sure West28th Street have ever produced a link ... I think their generic commentary is referring to a legacy Felicitas link ... unless I've missed a pertinent comms!?

    When I requested my details back in the day they just pinged it all over on email....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    Jog on!...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    If you send any form of ID just make sure you redact your signature.

    Having your DOB isn’t going to make a difference to their campaign.
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    I'm going to reply to Greenwoods later today with all my analysis and some of my documentation ... the documents highlight a number of defects that should be of interest... hopefully the defects I've found can assist the wider group....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    The FCA are utterly useless ... they can't give me a binary answer to the following question.

    Do Ethica Resolve hold the correct permissions to collect a debt on behalf of another company who claims the alleged debt is CCA regulated ... yes or no?

    FCA answer: Give Ethica a...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    If you’ve nothing constructive to say that is of tangible benefit don’t bother posting.

    your thoughts and theories are irrelevant and somebody else has said the same thing multiple times over the last x number of years.

    fact check your bollocks … some people are naive...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by shampoo; 9 September 2026, 12:29.

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    Nice one ... I'll do the same....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    Did you complain?...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    The problem with Elysium's approach is that they're trying to find silver bullet for 650+ people ... there will be people in the mix whose cases are far simpler to resolve than others i.e. missing documentation that can't be cured and is critical for successful litigation....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • shampoo
    replied to West 28th Street Limited
    The best way to manage Elysium is to ask what is the strategy, what are the milestones, and what is the cost ... simple....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:

No activity results to display
Show More
 

6 October 2026


5 October 2026


16 September 2026


15 September 2026


13 September 2026


10 September 2026


Working...
X