• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

User Profile

Collapse

Profile Sidebar

Collapse
malvolio
malvolio
More fingers than teeth
Last Activity: Yesterday, 20:54
Joined: 6 July 2005
Location: Walking in the garden, dreaming of Olivia...
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
  • Source
Clear All
new posts

  • I did read the OP and I did understand the question. The answer remains "no" if only because the BIK is still due personally and the cost will be in the same ball park. Of course you might find a difference price between a personal life assurance policy and a commercial one through the business...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Does IPSE still have a library of contract templates?
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • OK, but how does that escape a BIK charge, since clearly it is not a business expense...? Also remembering that a director is not an employee, if that has any impact....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Also worth noting that the "Key Person" life cover is not directly comparable to life insurance, in that it is protecting the company from the loss of a key worker, not the life of a named individual. It may be a difference without distinction, but it would be as well to check that both do...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Quick answer? No to both...

    Basically both fail the "wholly and exclusively" test. As your accountant says, doesn't matter who pays for it, the tax liability is yours personally.
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    Yes, to which Labour's plan seem to be making employing people and utilising the flexible workforce even more risky, difficult and expensive, so such work will go offshore. Clever, isn't it......
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    "My Lot"? How many times do I have to say that I have no faith in "my lot" in its current iteration. They are a waste of time.

    Equally, we are about to replace them with something infinitely worse - on past history at least - with no idea what they represent other than...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    And that letter was saying something that was entirely wrong and irrelevant to the debate in question. Regardless of who wrote it.

    Still, if you can't understand the thrust of the problem with Rayner, or insist that only your perspective is the right one, then there's no point discussing...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    You need to widen your reading. X and TikTok are a bit limiting....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    Yet again, missing the whole point. It's not about her background, or anyone else's.

    Were Rayner commenting on anyone else facing the same as yet unproven accusations, she would again be screaming that they resign....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    I said "some commentators", aka full time contractors several of whom I know personally - on LinkedIn among others. I'm not that interested myself in anything other than a general way, an as eek says have little real visibility of the problem.

    Truss you may remember, was going...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    Because according to some commentators, because OPW is driving companies to move to FTCs rather than risk using contractors.

    As you say I'm out if the game, so perhaps take a wider perspective......
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    No and as far as we are concerned that is directly down to the off payroll rules as presently defined distorting the market for freelance workers. It remains to be seen if the latest amendment to taxation make a difference.

    Our economy isn't good, but it is better than an awful lot of...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    If you look at the actual numbers, the British economy is actually in fairly good shape compared to, let's say, Germany and France. Truss's "crashing" has been more than corrected.

    Of course, the carryover from that "crash" are still with us in terms of the cost of living...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    There's lots on Starmer from never-ending U-turns, constant inaccurate claims like "crashed the economy" in the face of evidence to the contrary (even the IMF is offering some now) no clarity on his overall objectives and even his very own lockdown party. Nobody seems to be very interested...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    I don't remember where I read it, but it wasn't made up.

    That is, however, not the whole point of the discussion. Do we want a potential deputy PM who thinks they don't have to tell the truth. That is the question......
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    Ho hum...

    From today's BBC news
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    No evidence you would accept perhaps.

    BBC reported 12 days back that Manchester police found no evidence of wrongdoing. That was challenged by an MP and they are re-examining the case. The MoS has solid evidence if her actual position which varies from her stated position and makes the...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    You got the point. Well done...

    Starmer continues to offer integrity and honesty. Not looking good so far....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Ms Rayner
    You miss the point. Its not about tax its about hypocrisy. Or doesn't that matter any more? Dunno about you but I'm peed off with politicians who say anything to avoid being held to account. You want to govern me... then be f***ing honest about your actions....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:

No activity results to display
Show More
 

3 March 2024


28 February 2024


27 February 2024


22 February 2024


16 February 2024


6 February 2024


5 February 2024


4 February 2024


Working...
X