- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
test please delete
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diver View PostI once took two girls back to their flat for a threesome. decided we should all have a bath together first.
Picked one naked lovely up and lowered her into the bath, back went, severe pain, had to hobble home without nooky and in severe pain
Now that is sufferingComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diver View PostAt £220,000 a year and a free ride in Bransons baloonComment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostAt least I'm getting the executive summary from his quoting Diver, thoughBazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010Comment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostDS23 has another 500 posts to read before he gets here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DS23 View Post
Bazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010Comment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post"Here's the science..."
32767 is the exact value of 32k.
From a sad, techie perspective that makes it an interesting number.
32768 is 32k + 1 which on some systems would cause a buffer overflow error.
32767 is the maximum length of a character string in an Oracle database, so one more than that would cause it to error.
When post 32768 came along, it rolled over to -32768, because it was signed. Even better, the system then said "Oh, look, all these posts have numbers greater than the current post count; they must be garbage data", and deleted the lot
Cue one empty "public forum"Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Highly strategic workforces ‘now blend AI with human IT contractors’ Today 22:56
- LinkedIn insecurity: Does my IT contractor career look bad in this? Yesterday 01:10
- The JSL nub for umbrellas/agencies: who runs PAYE and who will HMRC bill? Aug 15 18:16
- How HMRC’s umbrella company JSL rules will play out Aug 13 23:33
- As Small Business Commissioner, I invite unpaid limited company contractors to come forward Aug 13 17:50
- Is Labour just going to leave limited company contracting zombie-like, neither dead nor alive? Aug 12 22:56
- Contracting Awards 2025 unveils ‘stellar’ shortlist Aug 11 21:31
- If it’s JSL liability, it’s Managed Service Providers (MSPs) too, potentially Aug 8 02:54
- Labour's new anti-late payment package ‘a contractor confidence boost’ Aug 7 00:33
- MSC test cases: Feb 2026 spells certainty for Boox/CK contractors Aug 6 05:36
Comment