Originally posted by Diver
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
test please delete
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diver View PostI once took two girls back to their flat for a threesome. decided we should all have a bath together first.
Picked one naked lovely up and lowered her into the bath, back went, severe pain, had to hobble home without nooky and in severe pain
Now that is sufferingComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diver View PostAt £220,000 a year and a free ride in Bransons baloonComment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostAt least I'm getting the executive summary from his quoting Diver, thoughBazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010Comment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostDS23 has another 500 posts to read before he gets here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DS23 View Post
Bazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010Comment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post"Here's the science..."
32767 is the exact value of 32k.
From a sad, techie perspective that makes it an interesting number.
32768 is 32k + 1 which on some systems would cause a buffer overflow error.
32767 is the maximum length of a character string in an Oracle database, so one more than that would cause it to error.
When post 32768 came along, it rolled over to -32768, because it was signed. Even better, the system then said "Oh, look, all these posts have numbers greater than the current post count; they must be garbage data", and deleted the lot
Cue one empty "public forum"Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Today 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Yesterday 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment