- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Churchill Knight & Boox clients being investigated as Managed Service Companies
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
elsewhere Carolyn Walsh has posted what might be a get out here - one that would throw the blame (and tax) at the agency via TAAR rather than your company.
See Post | Feed | LinkedIn
It boils down to the reason why you created your limited company:-
1) if it was for limited liability reasons the reason isn't tax avoidance.
2) if it was for tax saving reasons at the recommendation of your accountant - than the accountant (and you) have the MSC problem
3) if it was because the agency only worked with limited companies its possible the blame is with the agency not you - you only created the company because the agency insisted on it.
Now I'm not 100% sure about Carolyn (because there are posts I would disagree with) but it's worth thinking about the above as you work out how to appeal and possibly throw point 3 in rather than point 1...merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
So, you're being left to fend for yourselves?
Comment
-
Originally posted by eek View Postelsewhere Carolyn Walsh has posted what might be a get out here - one that would throw the blame (and tax) at the agency via TAAR rather than your company.
See Post | Feed | LinkedIn
It boils down to the reason why you created your limited company:-
1) if it was for limited liability reasons the reason isn't tax avoidance.
2) if it was for tax saving reasons at the recommendation of your accountant - than the accountant (and you) have the MSC problem
3) if it was because the agency only worked with limited companies its possible the blame is with the agency not you - you only created the company because the agency insisted on it.
Now I'm not 100% sure about Carolyn (because there are posts I would disagree with) but it's worth thinking about the above as you work out how to appeal and possibly throw point 3 in rather than point 1...
I remember I was relieved at the time as we all know what kind of Umbrella I had been using until then. What a diabolical ironyLast edited by GregRickshaw; 5 April 2022, 11:18.Comment
-
Originally posted by GregRickshaw View PostFinancially yes we are, CK are advising on 'good solicitors' etc., CK can't (how ironic) 'get involved' at the hearing as they are not on trial.
Then there’s no loyalty issues for staying with them - I would get out as fast as my legs (and accounts) would carry me…"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Originally posted by GregRickshaw View PostFinancially yes we are, CK are advising on 'good solicitors' etc., CK can't (how ironic) 'get involved' at the hearing as they are not on trial.
Did you previously say that HMRC have identified CK clients to take to the FTT as test/lead cases? How the hell are they going to afford representation?
With the CBS case, my guess is most clients folded (settled), and it was just a handful of brave (foolhardy) souls who took it to the FTT/UT/CoA.Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market.Comment
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
In which case, I'm struggling to see how this ever gets to tribunal. For a decent tax barrister, you're looking at £100k to take a case to the FTT.
Did you previously say that HMRC have identified CK clients to take to the FTT as test/lead cases? How the hell are they going to afford representation?
With the CBS case, my guess is most clients folded (settled), and it was just a handful of brave (foolhardy) souls who took it to the FTT/UT/CoA.
I did say that yes, I was quoting verbatim from CK's response
Yes for all the bravado about us not being MSC, we have been declared MSC so if CK are found guilty of creating us as MSC, you can imagine how much that would cost in time and financials for those brave enough to go forward to prove actually we are not MSC. eek has thrown out the nugget about the 'forced into' legislation which may help but for me I don't have the stomach or time to fight this.
As has been said many times, it is nothing more than a IR35 raid of which the outcome will be thousands driven to Umbrellas and the rest of us paying on account knowing full well we may as well sling that money on 50/1 shot at Wolverhampton.
If I weren't so full of hate right now, you have to say it's a very clever move by Hector.
Comment
-
ArrayOriginally posted by Sonic3389 View PostThis part worries me, what idiots did they speak to that told them this? who tf can't pay themselves without checking the portal(s)? The new tax limits are announced before each new tax year starts, you know right then and there what you'll be paying yourself for the year?
If I engage an accountant that has a portal then it's a handy tool that shows me all the information in one place. There's nothing in a portal I couldn't work out for myself (and hence would have to be careful about how I worded any evidence to Hector).
Hector - the portal tells you what to do and you have no idea what to do without it.
Me - The portal is a useful tool that shows me some calculations I could easily put in a spreadsheet or two (or a different software package/SaaS provision) - I can do all that for myself but I am buying a service that does it - I am using it for calculations but I'm not reliant on it.
I mean I can read a map or gawp at roadsigns but I tend to use satnav now as it's easier - does that make Garmin an MSC?
HMRC are nuts and out of control.Last edited by Peoplesoft bloke; 5 April 2022, 12:32.Comment
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostThen there’s no loyalty issues for staying with them - I would get out as fast as my legs (and accounts) would carry me…Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market.Comment
-
Originally posted by cojak View Post
Then there’s no loyalty issues for staying with them - I would get out as fast as my legs (and accounts) would carry me…
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Yesterday 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment