Originally posted by DealorNoDeal
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Churchill Knight & Boox clients being investigated as Managed Service Companies
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
merely at clientco for the entertainment -
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
They could be chancing their arm. It wouldn't be the first time they've tried it on.
The trouble is, even if they've got a really flimsy case, they might still let it go to tribunal. It wouldn't be the first time they've done that either.
Hopefully CK go the distance, and don't leave clients high and dry like many firms have in the past.
This is likely to run and run, I think. Very interesting.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Originally posted by GregRickshaw
CK have confirmed they could be liable and face penalties too. On one hand it means we haven't been thrown to the wolves alone on the other Hector clearly smells blood here, the floodgates opening springs to mind.
Another couple of years of watching the letterbox is what it means for the contractors at the end of the food chain.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View PostAre HMRC using the MSC angle to avoid having to carry out individual IR35 investigations?
However, if CK were really just offering accounting services at arms length, it seems unlikely that the MSC legislation would apply (indeed, it was explicitly envisaged not to apply in those circumstances). The client portal is an interesting angle and was always a bad idea for all sorts of reasons, but I wouldn't have put the MSC legislation among them. I suppose the angle here is "managing client company finances", but that sounds very tenuous unless they were directly making payments or doing something unusual that was unlike ordinary accounting services. Another interesting angle might be the tax loss insurance offered/promoted/pushed by some accountants w/r to IR35, which potentially makes the accountant "involved" with the MSC as defined in the MSC legislation.Comment
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
Well, the order of application of legislation is the agency legislation first, then the MSC legislation second, then the IR35 legislation third. So, yes, in the sense that the MSC legislation takes precedence over the IR35 legislation and IR35 is only considered where the MSC legislation does not apply. Obviously, with Chapter 8 of Part 2 of ITEPA (aka old IR35), you are looking contract-by-contract, so the finest resolution possible. An MSCP offering a solution to a bunch of MSCs is a very appealing prospect in that context.
However, if CK were really just offering accounting services at arms length, it seems unlikely that the MSC legislation would apply (indeed, it was explicitly envisaged not to apply in those circumstances). The client portal is an interesting angle and was always a bad idea for all sorts of reasons, but I wouldn't have put the MSC legislation among them. I suppose the angle here is "managing client company finances", but that sounds very tenuous unless they were directly making payments or doing something unusual that was unlike ordinary accounting services. Another interesting angle might be the tax loss insurance offered/promoted/pushed by some accountants w/r to IR35, which potentially makes the accountant "involved" with the MSC as defined in the MSC legislation.
Mind you we are all trying to guess the mindset of some random people in HMRC tasked on finding a pile of money from a stone - the logic they will be using may be very tenuous although that won't help the people involved nor given how tax tribunals work and the people who sit on them offer them much hope that common sense prevails (sorry Greg).merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by eek View Post
I'm looking at the timing and wondering if the issues comes from payroll and that CK may have done something like automatically generate payslips and RTI submissions rather than responding to a button being pressed.
Mind you we are all trying to guess the mindset of some random people in HMRC tasked on finding a pile of money from a stone - the logic they will be using may be very tenuous although that won't help the people involved nor given how tax tribunals work and the people who sit on them offer them much hope that common sense prevails (sorry Greg).
Comment
-
I do think it comes down to the portal. Take for example processing invoices and timesheets - the process is likely to be 100% identical to how CK’s umbrella does it because so I suspect they use identical pages and backend code.
merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
I'd hope your tax investigation insurance would cover this. Have asked on the ipse forum for confirmation.
Anyone know if closing your company (something I'm intending to do later this year) protects against this sort of crap (if HMRC do widen the net)?Comment
-
There are a lot of useful hints in this ESM about areas of possible focus:
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-man...manual/esm3520
Preparation of invoices is potentially one of them, along with expenses, but it depends on the details of what went on and the extent to which you were (or were not) in control of them.
Again, there are two bars to jump here. One, that CK was a MSCP. Two, that it was "involved" with the client MSCs.Comment
-
In my estimation, the third, fourth and fifth items in that ESM are most likely to be under scrutiny.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, seen Halifax’s 18-month fixed rate remortgage? Today 09:59
- Contractors, don’t be fooled by HMRC Spotlight 67 on MSCs Yesterday 09:20
- HMRC warns IT consultants and others of 12 ‘payroll entities’ Dec 3 09:15
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Dec 2 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
Comment