Who's been banned and why? Your right to reply.

[mudskipper]

Dunno. Maybe they were just saying that the injunction was stupid, rather than posting stuff designed to indicate who the subjects of the injunction are?

Maybe they made their post before the warning. Or maybe they have incriminating photos.

[AtW]

Ban them for 2 more days -

Celebrity injunction extended for two more days by supreme court | Media | The Guardian

[northernladuk]

Ban them for 2 more days -

Celebrity injunction extended for two more days by supreme court | Media | The Guardian

And then fwow them to the fwor centuwian.

[NickFitz]

<redacted>

Hmm, posting exactly the kind of thing people got banned for is a bold move…

[Troll]

Hmm, posting exactly the kind of thing people got banned for is a bold move…

Snitch

[NotAllThere]

Snitch

Nope. Spotted that one worselnes, innit.

[eek]

Nope. Spotted that one worselnes, innit.

Don't worry you only have to deal with this until Friday. The appeal tomorrow is going hear arguments now on Thursday. Decision possibly Friday,,,

[SimonMac]

Ok, so why wasn't the offender of 'Celebrity couple' who not only created the thread but also made a post banned?

Because we did it before the mods got pissed off

[Mordac]

Ok, so why wasn't the offender of 'Celebrity couple' who not only created the thread but also made a post banned?

Starting a discussion is one thing, but not naming (or hinting at) the subject, kind of gets one off the hook. I may have come close to a ban by naming one of the subject's "works" in that thread, but that post just got deleted. Try reading the rules, and if you have trouble understanding them, I know a primary school teacher who would be happy to help you out. For a small fee...Plus my commission...

[mudskipper]

One of my more successful threads, I'd posit.