Originally posted by mudskipper
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Who's been banned and why? Your right to reply.
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostNot sure the prayers from a god denier will help him much
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostPerhaps they can be permitted to bank their excess jail time to be deducted from their next sentence?Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Nice to see NAT is trying to blame the admin tools for his failure to ban 2 different posters...merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostNice to see NAT is trying to blame the admin tools for his failure to ban 2 different posters...I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
I really wish CUK employed shadow-banning. The idea of these berks writing replies all day and getting told afterwards "sorry nobody saw them" is quite nice.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostI really wish CUK employed shadow-banning. The idea of these berks writing replies all day and getting told afterwards "sorry nobody saw them" is quite nice.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Or perhaps if you're banned, you can post but all your posts are replaced with pet-shaming photos.
Last edited by d000hg; 2 October 2020, 14:30.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostI really wish CUK employed shadow-banning.
I've checked his profile. He's got 23 infraction points. 3 is a one day ban. I'm the first to admit if I get things wrong, but in this case, not mea culpa.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostNice to see NAT is trying to blame the admin tools
Oi! Calling Me and Cojak "Admin tools" is a ban... oh, OK, fair point, carry on.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostSo do I. I've proposed it more than once.
I've checked his profile. He's got 23 infraction points. 3 is a one day ban. I'm the first to admit if I get things wrong, but in this case, not mea culpa.
You would have been sacked if you had been so incompetent at your day job.Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Comment