Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Crimewatch - Madeleine McCann
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
And I thought some of the stupid posts on this thread couldn't be beaten.Originally posted by TheBigD View Post
The concensus of many here is that the McCanns are partly responsible for the abduction, because they left their child in an environment where she was vulnerable. Ergo, the abducter is partly not responsible because the child was already vulnerable.Comment
-
Tell me about itOriginally posted by jmo21 View PostAnd I thought some of the stupid posts on this thread couldn't be beaten.
"vulnerable"? They left her tucked up in bed in her hotel room.
From the way some people here go on, you'd think they'd left her in the hyena cage at the local zoo.Last edited by OwlHoot; 18 October 2013, 10:27.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Exactly. If she'd been left in a hyena cage, she wouldn't have been abducted. So the parents are at fault for leaving her in a hotel room, instead of at the local zoo.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Surely the hotel are liable too then. I mean, you ought to be safe in your room.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostTell me about it
"vulnerable"? They left her was tucked up in bed in her hotel room.
From the way some people here go on, you'd think they'd left her in the hyena cage at the local zoo.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
No, you idiot!! The hyena is to blame for not coming to collect her.Originally posted by doodab View PostSurely the hotel are liable too then. I mean, you ought to be safe in your room.Comment
-
Well there's something in that, seriously.Originally posted by doodab View PostSurely the hotel are liable too then. I mean, you ought to be safe in your room.
Obviously the hotel's CCTV and security weren't up to scratch, especially as their apartment seemed to be easily accessible from the street.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
It depends on whether the hotel offered a child safety service. If they did then they are probably liable otherwise the parents would be responsible.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostWell there's something in that, seriously.
Obviously the hotel's CCTV and security weren't up to scratch, especially as their apartment seemed to be easily accessible from the street.Comment
-
And the abductor?Originally posted by MyUserName View PostIt depends on whether the hotel offered a child safety service. If they did then they are probably liable otherwise the parents would be responsible.Comment
-
Would be responsible for the abduction (as I have said many times through the thread).Originally posted by Old Greg View PostAnd the abductor?
I thought, here, we were talking about who would be responsible for the girl not being supervised?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Today 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Jul 6 08:20

Comment