Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Crimewatch - Madeleine McCann
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by TheBigD View Post
The concensus of many here is that the McCanns are partly responsible for the abduction, because they left their child in an environment where she was vulnerable. Ergo, the abducter is partly not responsible because the child was already vulnerable.Comment
-
Originally posted by jmo21 View PostAnd I thought some of the stupid posts on this thread couldn't be beaten.
"vulnerable"? They left her tucked up in bed in her hotel room.
From the way some people here go on, you'd think they'd left her in the hyena cage at the local zoo.Last edited by OwlHoot; 18 October 2013, 10:27.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Exactly. If she'd been left in a hyena cage, she wouldn't have been abducted. So the parents are at fault for leaving her in a hotel room, instead of at the local zoo.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostTell me about it
"vulnerable"? They left her was tucked up in bed in her hotel room.
From the way some people here go on, you'd think they'd left her in the hyena cage at the local zoo.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostSurely the hotel are liable too then. I mean, you ought to be safe in your room.Comment
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostSurely the hotel are liable too then. I mean, you ought to be safe in your room.
Obviously the hotel's CCTV and security weren't up to scratch, especially as their apartment seemed to be easily accessible from the street.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostWell there's something in that, seriously.
Obviously the hotel's CCTV and security weren't up to scratch, especially as their apartment seemed to be easily accessible from the street.Comment
-
Originally posted by MyUserName View PostIt depends on whether the hotel offered a child safety service. If they did then they are probably liable otherwise the parents would be responsible.Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostAnd the abductor?
I thought, here, we were talking about who would be responsible for the girl not being supervised?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
Comment