What's speling bee's view on this thread?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Crimewatch - Madeleine McCann
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostThese two statements are consistent.
So they are responsible for leaving their children unaccompanied but only to the same extent as every other parent who has left their children in a similar way? They are not responsible in any way for the abduction?Comment
-
Originally posted by MyUserName View PostYes, that is an accurate assessment of my position - although if you wanted to be particularly picky you could probably change 'children' to be 'similarly aged children'.Comment
-
Originally posted by oracleslave View PostWhat's speling bee's view on this thread?The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostSo does someone who drives carelessly bear the same level of responsibility as someone who causes death by careless driving?Comment
-
Originally posted by MyUserName View PostNo, you idiot!! The hyena is to blame for not coming to collect her.
You can't have your cake and eat it.Comment
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostAnd if so, do they deserve the same punishment?Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostSo does someone who drives carelessly bear the same level of responsibility as someone who causes death by careless driving?Comment
-
Originally posted by MyUserName View PostI would have to think about that analogy as it does not feel like it fits. First you would need to clarify exactly which way each person was driving and exactly how the death was caused.
Person B is not driving carefully on main road in town because he's adjusting his sunglasses in the rear view mirror and a child walks out in front of him and because he is not looking properly he does not break in time and kills the child.Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostSo does someone who drives carelessly bear the same level of responsibility as someone who causes death by careless driving?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
Comment