• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Crimewatch - Madeleine McCann

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Hairy View Post
    I think is getting to the strawman stage now. I don't carry around antivenom on holiday in the off chance my kid gets bitten, I don't have a surgeon on standby in case she trips over carrying a pyrex dish to the sunday dinner table and bleeds to death after cutting a main vein, I don't pack a parachute for her when she flies just in case the plane goes down.

    But what I do do if someone tells me, as they did in Florida a few years back, that they've seen bull sharks, is not let her go into the water, if there is very strong medication in the house (which there has been of late), I ensure it's in a place she can't get to, my guns are locked in a safe and if I go out, I ensure people are there to look after her.

    I genuinely do not know, why this is carrying on. Admitting she took a risk, admits it was risky behaviour. If you can't see culpability, on a large scale, then I genuinely will never get your point.
    Because for some people, criticizing other parents makes them feel/look like better parents.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Hairy View Post
      I think is getting to the strawman stage now. I don't carry around antivenom on holiday in the off chance my kid gets bitten, I don't have a surgeon on standby in case she trips over carrying a pyrex dish to the sunday dinner table and bleeds to death after cutting a main vein, I don't pack a parachute for her when she flies just in case the plane goes down.

      But what I do do if someone tells me, as they did in Florida a few years back, that they've seen bull sharks, is not let her go into the water, if there is very strong medication in the house (which there has been of late), I ensure it's in a place she can't get to, my guns are locked in a safe and if I go out, I ensure people are there to look after her.

      I genuinely do not know, why this is carrying on. Admitting she took a risk, admits it was risky behaviour. If you can't see culpability, on a large scale, then I genuinely will never get your point.
      My point? I think they took an unacceptable risk, not just with the benefit of hindsight. But the point I am making here is that it is not black and white, but there are many shades of grey. I wonder what would have been deemed acceptable 50, 100 or 150 years ago. If it was different, were they wrong and are we right?

      Comment


        Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
        My point? I think they took an unacceptable risk, not just with the benefit of hindsight. But the point I am making here is that it is not black and white, but there are many shades of grey. I wonder what would have been deemed acceptable 50, 100 or 150 years ago. If it was different, were they wrong and are we right?
        Indeed - and there is something about being on holiday that causes you to let down your guard and do stuff you wouldn't do at home - it can feel like 'stepping back in time'. Getting into a taxi without seatbelts is a good example of a risk you'd probably take on holiday which you wouldn't at home.

        Comment


          Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
          Indeed - and there is something about being on holiday that causes you to let down your guard and do stuff you wouldn't do at home - it can feel like 'stepping back in time'. Getting into a taxi without seatbelts is a good example of a risk you'd probably take on holiday which you wouldn't at home.
          True. But the risks they took went well beyond that kind of thing. Look I dont think they deserved it, If they did deserve punsihment then they have been punished 100 times over. I just find them very odd as individuals and for some reason they just dont elicit the kind of sympathy from me that people in their position normally would

          Comment


            Originally posted by Hairy View Post
            But what I do do if someone tells me, as they did in Florida a few years back, that they've seen bull sharks, is not let her go into the water, ...
            She'd be fine - You're more likely to be killed by a bee than a shark.

            although I'd keep an eye on her in the water, and shout if I saw fins circling her
            Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

            Comment


              Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
              She'd be fine - You're more likely to be killed by a bee than a shark.

              although I'd keep an eye on her in the water, and shout if I saw fins circling her
              Absolutely. Sharks just hate it when you shout.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                My point? I think they took an unacceptable risk, not just with the benefit of hindsight. But the point I am making here is that it is not black and white, but there are many shades of grey. I wonder what would have been deemed acceptable 50, 100 or 150 years ago. If it was different, were they wrong and are we right?
                Look, I know I am getting lambasted for this, but this is something you try your hardest not to. There are risks, tulip, I beat myself up if I lose concentration in the car and they're in it. I think it's once you identify something is a rick, and an unacceptable one, which is where I think we're at, you just don't do it.

                Seriously here, if you and your wife were invited for a night out, 15 mins away, for dinner, dance and drinks and you couldn't get a sitter, how long would you think about it before you said no? Seriously.

                My wife and I were like CIA operative when our first kid was born; one of us would sweep through a persons house identifying tulip my kid would hurt herself on, or break, and make mental notes to keep an eye on areas, and arn of damage. we knew what our kid was like, and knew what they'd do. Take your eyes off them and they're up to something, especially at Maddy's age. Kids, at that age, don't really understand cause and effect.

                My simple point, is most parents would recognise it as a bad idea. They didn't, and it's this that concerns me.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                  As MS says, if the wrst happened I would blame myself. But would I be to blame?
                  I think it comes under "tulip happens" in such cases.
                  Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                  I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                  Originally posted by vetran
                  Urine is quite nourishing

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                    My point? I think they took an unacceptable risk, not just with the benefit of hindsight. But the point I am making here is that it is not black and white, but there are many shades of grey. I wonder what would have been deemed acceptable 50, 100 or 150 years ago. If it was different, were they wrong and are we right?
                    I think my view is that this is fairly black and white; the McCanns chose to leave their kids alone.

                    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
                    Indeed - and there is something about being on holiday that causes you to let down your guard and do stuff you wouldn't do at home - it can feel like 'stepping back in time'. Getting into a taxi without seatbelts is a good example of a risk you'd probably take on holiday which you wouldn't at home.
                    I don't agree with this view, and perhaps that does make me a bit of a nutter. If a taxi on hols doesn't have seatbelts, we don't get in it.

                    I woud have, pre child days - so not sure what that says about me.
                    Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
                    +5 Xeno Cool Points

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by socialworker View Post
                      Absolutely. Sharks just hate it when you shout.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X