Originally posted by NickFitz
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Who's been banned and why.
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Your talents are wasted at cuk towers. You should be a spin doctor.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostNeed new glasses? (ahem)Comment
-
Ah, you've fixed it. Well doneOriginally posted by NotAllThere View PostNeed new glasses? (ahem)
Comment
-
Play that game and I tend to ban both parties, then I don't have worry about who started it.Originally posted by d000hg View PostQuite a few people are easy to goad to the point of getting themselves banned, if you want to play that kind of game. I'm often tempted, but then I ignored most of the most annoying posters to lessen the temptation."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
have we implemented the 3,000 bans and you're out rule yet.
MF must be awfully close to that level.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
That's one reason I don't play it - however part of the game is NOT getting yourself banned.Originally posted by cojak View PostPlay that game and I tend to ban both parties, then I don't have worry about who started it.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I play by different rules...Originally posted by d000hg View PostThat's one reason I don't play it - however part of the game is NOT getting yourself banned."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostSpeaks volumes that the first ban to be listed in there has the wrong date

Originally posted by SimonMac View PostWho's been banned and why.

But as its NAT he seems to have ****ed up at the first hurdle, who would have thought of that happening
Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
What you mean the rules change depending on your mood and the time of month.Originally posted by cojak View PostI play by different rules...merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment